Saturday, March 1, 2014

Syria Crisis 'Threat To Global Security'

Syria On Track To Become World's Largest Source Of Refugees

NPR (blog) - ‎Feb 28, 2014‎
A photo from Syria is grabbing the world's attention: a sea of people lining up for food amid the rubble of a Palestinian refugee camp inside Syria. Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia was so moved by the image, he took to the Senate floor, saying "a country of ...
Syria Crisis 'Threat To Global Security'

Syria Crisis 'Threat To Global Security'

Conditions in Syria continue to deteriorate and millions seek refuge in bordering countries, as the UN says more must be done.

Residents wait to receive food aid distributed by the U.N. Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) at the besieged al-Yarmouk camp, south of Damascus
Video: UN team are being allowed to work in Yarmouk for the first time in 2 years
The crisis in Syria is the biggest threat to regional and global security that the world has witnessed in decades, according to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.
Antonio Guterres told Sky News he hoped a UN Security Council resolution on humanitarian aid to Syria, passed unanimously this week, would provide much needed relief to besieged areas in the country.
"For the moment, the situation is not good at all but my hope is in the fact the Security Council approved the resolution and the Syrian Government said it's ready to discuss its implementation with the United National Security Council …
"I hope the resolution will now create the conditions to organise a method allowing humanitarians to go into these areas and to be able to provide assistance to all the civilians who are trapped there."
Residents wait to receive food aid distributed by the UN at the besieged al-Yarmouk camp
A Palestinian woman and her child in the Yarmouk camp
Mr Guterres also told Sky News that the UN estimates three million Syrians have fled the country because of the crisis.
"We are still having 100,000 new refugees per month and we have more than two-and-a-half million registered refugees but we are convinced that more than three million people have already left the country fleeing the war," he said.
His comments come as the UN released a photo of thousands of Palestinian refugees in the Yarmouk camp in Damascus desperately queuing for food parcels.
More than 18,000 people are under siege in the refugee camp and face shortages in food, medicine and clean water. The Yarmouk camp, in the south of Damascus, has witnessed some of the worst fighting in the Syrian capital.
Palestinians wait to receive humanitarian aid distributed by the UN at al-Yarmouk camp
More than 18,000 people are under siege in the camp
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees described conditions as "apocalyptic" and said the delivery of 6,500 food parcels and 10,000 polio vaccinations were "a drop in the ocean" compared to the needs of residents.
As conditions within Syria continue to deteriorate, millions have fled into bordering countries seeking refuge. Mr Guterres acknowledged it was placing a huge strain on the economies of countries such as Lebanon and Jordan and is urging the international community to share the burden.
"Lebanon today has a number of refugees that, if compared proportionally, would mean 15 million refugees in France, 32 million in Russia or 71 million in the US. It's a miracle that Lebanon has been able to cope with this challenge. Massive support from the international community and massive solidarity is necessary for these countries to cope with this challenge."
Residents wait to receive food aid distributed by the UN at the besieged al-Yarmouk camp
The UNHCR wants Europe to take more refugees
Despite pledging £600m in humanitarian aid Britain was recently criticised by human rights organisations for not opening its borders to more Syrian refugees.  The Government agreed last month to allow in 500 of the most vulnerable Syrian but the UN's High Commissioner says EU states need to do more.
"We are making very strong appeals, first of all, for all borders to be open not only in the region but also in Europe.
"It really breaks my heart to see Syrians who are not able to enter the border of one member of the EU or Syrians who have to die in the Mediterranean drowning because they can't find a safe way to reach Europe. Borders need to be opened, more positive visa policies need to be established."
  end quote from:
 
Syria Crisis 'Threat To Global Security'

Knife wielding terrorists kill 28 in China at Train Station

Knife-wielding 'terrorists' kill 28, injure dozens at China train station

CNN - ‎38 minutes ago‎
(CNN) -- At least 28 people were killed and 113 wounded on Saturday evening when a group of "terrorists" armed with knives stormed a railway station in the southwest Chinese city of Kunming, according to state news agency Xinhua, citing authorities.
Mass stabbing at Chinese train station
'Violent terror attack' at Chinese train station by knife-wielding men leaves 28 ...
China mass stabbing: Deadly knife attack in Kunming
UN Chief Slams "Terrible Attack on Civilians" in SW China
Knife-wielding terrorists kill at least 29 in savage Chinese train station attack 

SHARE THIS




Knife-wielding 'terrorists' kill 28, injure dozens at China train station

By CNN Staff
updated 6:15 PM EST, Sat March 1, 2014
Luggage lies scattered inside the Kunming Railway Station in Kunming, the capital of southwest China's Yunnan Province, on Saturday, March 1, after an attack left several dead and more than 100 injured. Luggage lies scattered inside the Kunming Railway Station in Kunming, the capital of southwest China's Yunnan Province, on Saturday, March 1, after an attack left several dead and more than 100 injured.
HIDE CAPTION
Deadly China railway attack
<<
<
1
2
3
4
5
>
>>
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
  • Five suspects reported dead
  • Police say it was a premeditated mob knife attack
  • At least 28 are killed, 113 wounded
  • 10 people wielding knives storm the station
(CNN) -- At least 28 people were killed and 113 wounded on Saturday evening when a group of "terrorists" armed with knives stormed a railway station in the southwest Chinese city of Kunming, according to state news agency Xinhua, citing authorities.
It was an organized, premeditated terrorist action involving more than 10 attackers, authorities told the news agency. Five suspects were shot to death and the hunt continued for others, according to authorities.
The report did not detail a possible motive.
People were attacked at the station square and ticket hall, Xinhua said in an update Sunday.
Chinese President Xi Jinping urged law enforcement "to investigate and solve the case and punish the terrorists in accordance with the law," according to Xinhua.
Map shows location of attackMap shows location of attack
Yang Haifei, a resident of Yunnan, told Xinhua he was buying a ticket when a group of people, most of them in black, rushed into the station and attacked.
"I saw a person come straight at me with a long knife and I ran away with everyone," he said, adding that people who were slower were severely injured. "They just fell on the ground."
He said he sustained injuries to his chest and back.
Doctors were seen transporting injured people to a hospital, the news agency reported.
A doctor with Kunming No.1 People's Hospital told Xinhua over the phone they're not sure of the number of casualties.
Xinhua said the Kunming railway station is one of the largest in southwest China.
The news agency quoted a 50-year-old woman whose older husband was among those killed.
"Why are the terrorists so cruel?" said Chen Guizhen, holding her husband's bloodied ID card.
Chinese Premier Li Keqiang asked local authorities to ensure safety at public places, Xinhua reported.
Two weeks ago, 11 "terrorists" died in an attack in northwest China's restive Xinjiang region.
Frequent outbreaks of violence have beset Xinjiang, a resource-rich area where the arrival of waves of Han Chinese people over the decades has fueled tensions with the Uyghurs, a Turkic-speaking, predominantly Muslim ethnic group.
end quote from:

Knife-wielding 'terrorists' kill 28, injure dozens at China train station

U.S. Lawmakers See Sanctions Not Troops as Ukraine Response

U.S. Lawmakers See Sanctions Not Troops as Ukraine Response

Bloomberg - ‎27 minutes ago‎
U.S. lawmakers from both parties urged President Barack Obama to lead an international effort to impose diplomatic and economic sanctions on Russia if it attacks Ukraine, though they stopped short of calling for armed intervention.
Obama warns Putin against Ukraine intervention
Russian parliament approves troop deployment in Ukraine
Obama on Crimea: “There Will Be Costs” - by Amy Davidson
Radical forces destabilising Ukraine must be stopped – Russia's UN envoy
Putin to Obama: Russia reserves right to protect its interests
Crimea

U.S. Lawmakers See Sanctions Not Troops as Ukraine Response

Photographer: Bulent Kilic/AFP via Getty Images
A man eats a meal at Kiev's Independence square on February 25, 2014.
U.S. lawmakers from both parties urged President Barack Obama to lead an international effort to impose diplomatic and economic sanctions on Russia if it attacks Ukraine, though they stopped short of calling for armed intervention.
The reaction preceded a 90-minute phone call between U.S. President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin today, during which Obama said the U.S. would suspend preparation for an upcoming G-8 meeting in Sochi, Russia, according to a White House statement.
Obama expressed “his deep concern over Russia’s clear violation of Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity” in actions Putin’s government already had taken, the statement said. And it warned that “Russia’s continued violation of international law will lead to greater political and economic isolation.”
Following through with a boycott of the G-8 meeting, set for June, and the freezing of assets of senior Russian officials are among further actions that Obama should pursue, the U.S. lawmakers said. Some Republicans said the U.S. and Western European allies also should consider suspending Russia from the G-8, a forum of the world’s seven leading industrialized democracies plus Russia.
“President Obama must lead a meaningful, unified response with our European allies to bring an immediate halt to these provocative Russian actions, which threaten international peace and security,” Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said today in a statement.

International Observers

Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat who heads the Armed Services Committee, said one possible specific step that the U.S. and its allies “could take would be to place a significant number of international observers on the ground in Ukraine, if requested by the Ukrainian government.”
“The presence of international observers on the ground could reduce the risk that Russia would make a false claim of provocative acts by Ukraine as an excuse for further violation of Ukrainian sovereignty, and thereby help avoid a conflict that nobody should want,” Levin said in a statement.
Samantha Power, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, later today broached the prospect of the deployment of such observers.
“That’s the best way to get the facts, monitor conduct, and prevent any abuses,” she said at an emergency meeting of the UN’s Security Council to discuss the Ukrainian situation.

McCain Comments

Senator John McCain of Arizona, the 2008 Republican presidential nominee defeated by Obama and a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called on the president “to rally our European and NATO allies to make clear what costs Russia will face for its aggression and to impose those consequences without further delay.”
McCain, who often has pushed for Obama to be more forceful in responding to international crises such as the civil war in Syria, stopped short of calling for military action, though. He said in a statement today that “there is a range of serious options at our disposal at this time without the use of military force.”
The reactions came as Russia’s parliament voted to approve military action in Ukraine after Russian troops seized airfields, roads and government buildings in the country’s Crimea region. The military movements in Crimea, home to Russia’s Black Sea fleet, risk destabilizing Ukraine as its new government negotiates with the U.S. and Europe for financial aid to avoid default.

‘Acts of Aggression’

Russia’s moves are “acts of aggression that violate Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity,” New York Representative Eliot Engel, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Relations Committee, said in a statement.
“The United States should work with our European partners to make clear that the violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty is unacceptable and ensure that Russia withdraws its troops without delay and refrains from further aggressive actions,” Engel said.
At the White House, Obama’s National Security Council met to receive an update on the Ukraine situation and discuss potential policy options, the council said in an e-mailed statement.
While the president didn’t attend the meeting, he was briefed by Susan Rice, the national security adviser, and other aides, the National Security Council said in a separate e-mailed statement.

‘Costs’ Warning

Obama, in a public statement yesterday, had warned Russia that there “will be costs” if it invades Ukraine, without specifying.
Most U.S. lawmakers, in line with public opinion, are wary of additional U.S. military intervention after more than a decade of wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Congress was poised to reject Obama’s request for military action in Syria last September, though planned votes were scuttled as the U.S. and Russia brokered a deal intended to rid that country of chemical weapons.
A New York Times/CBS poll released Sept. 9 found that 62 percent of Americans said the U.S. shouldn’t take the leading role in the world in trying to solve international conflicts. The poll of 1,011 people had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. In 2003, by a 48-43 margin, the respondents said the U.S. should take the leading role.

Deposed President

Violence in Ukraine, a major pipeline route for Russian gas to the rest of Europe, escalated in February amid frustration that demands for new elections and broader changes in governance were being ignored. Ukrainian lawmakers deposed Viktor Yanukovych, the former Russian-backed president of Ukraine, on Feb. 22 after clashes with protesters left at least 82 people dead.
Putin is asserting his power over the Crimea region, a part of Ukraine with a large ethnic-Russian population, after Yanukovych’s overthrow. Meanwhile, the U.S. has supported Ukraine’s new government.
A U.S. official described events over the past days as orchestrated steps intended to make Russian military intervention in Crimea appear legitimate. The official requested anonymity to discuss classified intelligence matters.

Ukrainian Caucus

In other reactions today from lawmakers, Representative Jim Gerlach, co-chairman of the Congressional Ukrainian Caucus, said “any military action Russia takes to reclaim territory would constitute a violation of international law.”
Obama should lay out specific diplomatic and economic sanctions “if Russia fails to stand down immediately,” the Pennsylvania Republican said.
In a joint letter to Obama yesterday, Senate Foreign Relations Committee members said they would be willing to authorize U.S. loan guarantees to Ukraine. The lawmakers said they “do not seek confrontation with President Putin and his government.”
The U.S. “should make use of the tools at its disposal, including targeted sanctions and asset recovery targeting corruption, to dissuade individuals who would foment unrest to undermine Ukraine’s territorial integrity or employ coercive economic measures against the Ukrainian people and the new Ukrainian government,” said the panel, which is led by Senator Robert Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat.
Menendez didn’t immediately respond to an e-mail today seeking further comment.
Texas Republican Senator Ted Cruz was among lawmakers proposing that Obama and European allies remove Russia from the G-8. “If we were serious about standing up to Putin’s power grab, we would immediately suspend Russian membership in the Group of Eight, which should consist of nations that can contribute to a civilized order,” he said in a statement yesterday.
Joining in that call today were Senator Marco Rubio, a Florida Republican, and Representative Tom Cotton, an Arkansas Republican.
To contact the reporters on this story: Silla Brush in Washington at sbrush@bloomberg.net; Derek Wallbank in Washington at dwallbank@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: John Walcott at jwalcott9@bloomberg.net
end quote from: 
 

U.S. Lawmakers See Sanctions Not Troops as Ukraine Response

Ear Infections

I'm sort of writing this as therapy for dealing with two friends with ear infections in the past year. Both of these people are friends and very individualistic men like myself. The main difference between them and me is they didn't have to survive a heart virus at age 50 like I did in 1998 and 1999. This changed me a lot and allowed me to be more open to medical help. Because without both angels helping me and medical practitioners helping me I would have died. I needed both.

This time (my two friends at different times) tried to avoid going to doctors because: "Doctors are expensive" and both men are very frugal and efficient with money and neither at the time had chosen to have health care insurance because of having good health most of their lives just like me.

However, Health care insurance was something I started buying by about age 45 because I could afford it then and after and because it is all about probabilities in the end after you are about 40 years of age.

You might think you are invincible because you always have been. "I was like this too" from about age 15 (after I got over childhood epilepsy) until I got my heart virus in 1998.

So, my first friend almost went deaf in one ear because he didn't go to the doctor early enough. But, eventually he did and the doctor said he was just barely able to save his hearing.

This last weekend I visited my friends in Mt. Shasta and my daughter and a friend of hers met me there. However, I found out that my friend and his girlfriend had both had the H1N1 virus and my friend after he got rid of the H1N1 flu virus got a bad ear infection but he refused to go to a doctor because he didn't have insurance yet. So, the pressure built up until his eardrum perforated itself and pus started to come out of his ear.

When I arrived he told me how grateful he was that his ear had perforated itself and I asked if he had been to a doctor yet. He said "NO" but that he had spent many hours researching his ailment on the Internet as he has a masters degree from UCLA and is very studious naturally. However, I said to him, "Though you might generally know all about this sort of thing your personal symptoms might be unique to yourself. Why not visit an Ear, nose and throat specialist who has seen hundreds or thousands of these things and get his or her opinion?" He told me that doctors only recommend anti-biotics about 5% of the time for ear infections because usually they aren't helpful.

I said, "What about just seeing an ENT specialist to make sure everything is okay?" He said, "I'm signing up for health insurance right now." But then his girlfriend said, "But you won't be covered until april sometime because you are just signing up now."

Later I had to drive home and he told me his hearing had recovered in this ear after draining out some more. I was very happy to hear this and hoped this good news would continue.

Also, I have no doubt that eventually he will get to an ENT specialist. It is just a matter of time.

The California Flood that impressed me the most that I witnessed:1995

I heard one day that the bridge that Crossed the Carmel River in 1995 was in the ocean. I thought to myself "How is that possible! That bridge is over a mile or more from the ocean. And it's out into the ocean?" This was something I had to see for myself.

So, I drove to this location to see for myself what had happened and talked to locals about it. I could see people parking their cars on the other side where the bridge had been looking sort of forlorn because there wasn't an easy way out for them if they lived the other side of the bridge without driving about 4 hours or more on dirt roads that also could or might be washed out in many places. At one point, the whole Monterey Peninsula as well as everything south of the Carmel River through Carmel Highlands all the way down to Big Sur was an island because water crossed the Hiway 1 freeway near Castroville which became impassable and even hiway 68 became impassable near Salinas as well. So, there only was a way out of the area by helicopter or plane for awhile.

Next to where the bridge over the Carmel River had been washed into the ocean (a mile or more) (and by the way this bridge could take Semi Trucks that drive every day to Big Sur to supply hotels, stores and Gas stations there stood The Crossroads which is a shopping mall. One Restaurant I looked through the windows and saw at least a foot of mud on the floor from when the river had crested a few feet above the shopping mall parking lot which meant that the movie theater had about 4 to 5 feet of water in it which you could still see the water mark from that whenever people went to a movie there while it was still open.

Nearby a bank had an underground parking garage and this filled completely with water and it was reported that cars were floating down inside like Mercedes and other more expensive cars trunk up into the air because the engine is heavier in water.

Hundreds of homes along the Carmel River were flooded from way upstream all the way to the ocean. The Hiway one bridge over the Carmel River was replaced with a temporary bridge and a new bridge I believe was built within a month or two as a rush job to replace this necessary bridge for all the people who live south of the Carmel river in Carmel Highlands, Big Sur and points South.

On top of this the road (Hiway 1) had been taken out by a rock slide below Big Sur so the people had no way out without using 4 wheel drives over unsafe rocky dirt roads that might collapse from the flooding too.

Historic Floods in California

If you have lived in California for very long you likely have noticed how the more evenly spaced light rains that have graced California since the 1950s until now (I have lived here off and on since 1952 when I was 4) are not around that much if at all. 

Now days it is either extreme drought or extreme rain (over 2 inches at a time which is liable to cause at least some flooding in our state because  of the extreme elevation changes in California compared to most of the rest of the U.S. East of the Mississippi River.

So, in sharing the floods historically in California I think it might be helpful for emergency personnel in our state to familiarize themselves with what has happened because it might be a harbinger of what is to come as well since we now have such extremes in our weather from Extreme droughts to 2 or more inches of rain coming in a day or two which likely will cause almost as much harm as the good it does in some areas ongoing.

 

Floods in California - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floods_in_California
Wikipedia
All types of floods can occur in California, though 90% are caused by riverine flooding. Such flooding generally occurs as a result of excessive rainfall, excessive ...

Floods in California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
All types of floods can occur in California, though 90% are caused by riverine flooding.[1] Such flooding generally occurs as a result of excessive rainfall, excessive snowmelt, excessive runoff, levee failure or a combination of these sources. Below is a list of flood events that were of significant impact to California

1800–99

Los Angeles Flood of 1825

Changed the course of the Los Angeles River from its western outlet into Santa Monica Bay following the course of Ballona Creek to a southern outlet at San Pedro Bay near where it is today.[2]

January 1850

In January 1850, a major flood devastated the new city of Sacramento; rain from heavy storms saturated the grounds upon which Sacramento was built, and the American and Sacramento rivers crested simultaneously.[3]

Years closely following January 1850

Many floods occurred later in the city of Sacramento and other low lying cities along the Sierra born rivers due to hydraulic mining at locations in the foothills e.g. malakoff diggings in which sludge runoffs purportedly raised the river beds in the valley below, an additional 2 ft.
Hydraulic Gold mining became a hot topic for the time and was eventually stopped by Ca. Lawmakers. Malokoff diggings is now a State Park missing a whole mountain due to the massive water jets that can still be seen there. Well worth the visit. Camping allowed, the old city still stands.[4]

December 1861 – January 1862: California's Great Flood

Beginning on December 24, 1861, and lasting for 45 days, the largest flood in California's recorded history was created, reaching full flood stage in different areas between January 9–12, 1862. The entire Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys were inundated for an extent of 300 miles (480 km), averaging 20 miles (32 km) in breadth. State government was forced to relocate from the capital in Sacramento for 18 months in San Francisco. The rain created an inland sea in Orange County, lasting about three weeks with water standing 4 feet (1.2 m) deep up to 4 miles (6 km) from the river.[1] The Los Angeles basin was flooded from the San Gabriel Mountains to the Palos Verdes Peninsula, at variable depths, excluding the higher lands which became islands until the waters receded. The Los Angeles basin lost 200,000 cattle by way of drowning, as well as homes, ranches, farm crops & vineyards being swept-away.

1900–49

1909: California flood

The storm extended from Fort Ross on the coast to the Feather River basin. La Porte, in the Feather River basin, had 57.41 inches (1,458 mm) of rain in 20 days, an event with a return period of 12,000 years. The flood episodes of 1907 and 1909 in California resulted in an overhaul of planned statewide flood control designs.[1]

December 1933 – January 1934: Crescenta Valley flood

In the last week of December 1933, 12 inches (300 mm) of rain fell in the communities of La Crescenta, La Cañada and Montrose just north of Los Angeles. On New Year's Eve, more rain fell. The result was a flood of mud and water that began around midnight, destroying more than 400 homes in this area. This was commemorated in Woody Guthrie's song "Los Angeles New Year's Flood". As a result of this flood, the Army Corps of Engineers and the County of Los Angeles built a flood control system of catch basins and concrete storm drains to prevent a repeat of the disaster.

February 1937: Santa Ana flood

The storm of February 4–7, 1937 resulted in the highest four-day rainfall totals at several stations in the Santa Ana River basin. The Riverside North station had over 8 inches (200 mm) of rain in that four days, which equaled a 450-year event. Other stations also received high amounts of rain within those four days.[1]

December 1937: Northeast California flood

The storm of December 1937 was a high-elevation event in the northeast corner of the state.[1]

Los Angeles Flood of 1938

Two significant cyclones moved through the region; one between February 27 and March 1 and the second between March 1 and March 3. Over 254 mm (10.0 in) of rain had fallen during the five-day period. Massive debris flows moved out from the San Gabriel Mountains into the Los Angeles Basin. Although Los Angeles County experienced damage, Riverside and Orange counties bore the brunt of the flooding. A total of 5601 homes were destroyed, and an additional 1500 homes were left uninhabitable. The three transcontinental railroads connecting Los Angeles to the outside world experienced washed out bridges and flooded lines, isolating the city. Mail service after the flood was conducted by the U.S. Coast Guard. The death toll was 115. It was the region's worst flood since New Year's Day of 1934. The result of this flood was the Flood Control Act of 1941, which authorized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to build a series of concrete sewers.[5]

1950–99

November 1950: California Flood

A statewide disaster was declared November 21 when floods caused 9 deaths and $32 million in damage.[6]

December 1955: California flood

The storm affected the central Sierra and South Bay areas. The Eel River on the North Coast saw the greatest flow of record to that time while Central Valley rivers saw near-record flows. A statewide disaster was declared, with the storm resulting in 74 deaths and $200 million in economic losses. The heaviest 24-hour rainfall was recorded on December 20, when 15.34 inches (390 mm) fell in Shasta County.[1] The storm's toll on Sutter County was severe. At 12:04 a.m. on December 24, 1955, a levee on the west bank of the Feather River, at Shanghai Bend, collapsed and a wall of water 21 feet high entered the county, flooding 90 percent of the City of Yuba City and the farmlands in the southern Yuba City basin. Some 600 people were rescued by helicopter, but 37 people drowned.[7]

March 1964: North Coast California tsunami

The 1964 Alaska earthquake caused a tsunami in March, completely devastating several North Coast towns and resulting in 14 deaths and an economic loss of $14 million in Del Norte County alone.[1]

December 1964: California flood

The six days from December 19–24, 1964 were the wettest ever recorded at many stations on the North Coast. Every major stream in the North Coast produced new high values of extreme peak flows. 34 California counties were declared disaster areas.[1]

January 1982: Northern California flood

Heavy rainfall in the San Francisco Bay region triggered on January 3–5 triggered thousands of debris flows from Santa Cruz Country to Contra Costa and Sonoma Counties, as well as flooding along the San Lorenzo River, Soquel Creek, and Aptos Creek in Santa Cruz County. Floods along creeks in Marin County plus added significant amounts of sediment to Tomales Bay. The landslides caused at least $66 million in damage. Landslides caused 25 of the 33 storm-caused deaths. Total estimated storm-related losses were $280 million.[8]

1986 California and Western Nevada floods

On February 11, 1986 a vigorous low pressure system drifted east out of the Pacific, creating a Pineapple Express[9] that lasted through February 24 unleashing unprecedented amounts of rain on northern California and western Nevada.[10] The nine-day storm over California constituted half of the average annual rainfall for the year.[1] Record flooding occurred in three streams that drain to the southern part of the San Francisco Bay area.[10] Extensive flooding occurred in the Napa and Russian rivers. Napa, north of San Francisco, recorded their worst flood to this time[11] while nearby Calistoga recorded 29 inches (740 mm) of rain in 10 days, creating a once-in-a-thousand-year rainfall event.[9] Records for 24-hour rain events were reported in the Central Valley and in the Sierra. One thousand-year rainfalls were recorded in the Sierras.[1] The heaviest 24-hour rainfall ever recorded in the Central Valley at 17.60 inches (447 mm) occurred on February 17 at Four Trees in the Feather River basin.[9] In Sacramento, nearly 10 inches (250 mm) of rain fell in an 11-day period.[1] System breaks in the Sacramento River basin included disastrous levee breaks in the Olivehurst and Linda area on the Feather River.[1] Linda, about 40 miles (64 km) north of Sacramento, was devastated after the levee broke on the Yuba River's south fork, forcing thousands of residents to evacuate.[12] In the San Joaquin River basin and the Delta, levee breaks along the Mokelumne River caused flooding in the community of Thornton and the inundation of four Delta islands.[1] Lake Tahoe rose 6 inches (150 mm) as a result of high inflow.[10] The California flood resulted in 13 deaths, 50,000 people evacuated and over $400 million in property damage.[1] 3000 residents of Linda joined in a class action lawsuit Paterno v. State of California, which eventually reached the California Supreme Court in 2004. The California high court affirmed the District Court of Appeal's decision that said California was liable for millions of dollars in damages.[12]

January and March 1995: California flood

During the events of January and March 1995, over 100 stations recorded their greatest 1-day rainfalls in that station’s history. The major brunt of the January storms hit the Sacramento River Basin and resulted in small stream flooding primarily due to storm drainage system failures, though flooding affected nearly every part of the state. The Salinas River exceeded its previous measured record crest by more than four feet, which was within a foot or two of the reputed crest of the legendary 1862 flood. The Napa River set a new peak record, and the Russian and Pajaro rivers approached their record peaks. 28 people were killed and the flood cost $1.8 billion.[1]

New Year's Day 1997: Northern California flood

A series of subtropical storms, collectively called a pineapple express, struck northern California from late December 1996 to early January 1997.[1] December 1996 was one of the wettest Decembers on record.[1] The Klamath River on California's North Coast experienced significant flooding which led to the river permanently changing course in some areas.[13] The Klamath National Forest experienced its worst flood since 1974.[13] Unprecedented flows from rain surged into the Feather River basin while melted snow surged into the San Joaquin River basin.[13] Rain fell at elevations up to 11,000 feet (3,400 m), prompting snow melt.[1][13] The Cosumnes River, a tributary to the San Joaquin River, bore the brunt of the flooding.[13] Sacramento was spared, though levee failures flooded Olivehurst, Arboga, Wilton, Manteca, and Modesto.[14] Massive landslides in the Eldorado National Forest east of Sacramento closed Highway 50.[13] Damages totaled US$35 million (1997 dollars).[13]
Watersheds in the Sierra Nevada were already saturated by the time three subtropical storms added more than 30 inches (760 mm) of rain in late December 1996 and early January 1997.[1] Levee failures due to breaks or overtopping in the Sacramento River Basin resulted in extensive damages.[1] In the San Joaquin River Basin, dozens of levees failed throughout the river system and produced widespread flooding.[1] The Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta also experienced several levee breaks and levee overtopping.[1] 48 counties were declared disaster areas, including all 46 counties in northern California.[1] Over 23,000 homes and businesses, agricultural lands, bridges, roads and flood management infrastructures – valued at about $2 billion – were damaged. Nine people were killed and 120,000 people were evacuated from their homes.[1] 300 square miles (780 km2) were flooded, including the Yosemite Valley, which flooded for the first time since 1861-62.[1]

See also

References

  1. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y "Historic Rainstorms in California". California Department of Water Resources. Retrieved 2007-10-23.
  2. Jump up ^ William Deverell, Whitewashed Adobe: The Rise of Los Angeles and the Remaking of Its Mexican Past, University of California Press, Los Angeles, 2005, Page 101-102
  3. Jump up ^ Thor Severson, Sacramento: An Illustrated History: 1839 to 1874, California Historical Society, 1973, Page 72
  4. Jump up ^ Malakoff Diggings Wikipedia Reference
  5. Jump up ^ SEMP: Evidence-based disaster management: preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation
  6. Jump up ^ "Yolo County Disasters Since 1950". Yolo Operational Area Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan. Retrieved 29 March 2011.
  7. Jump up ^ County of Sutter, Office of Emergency Management
  8. Jump up ^ Ellen, Stephen D.; & Wieczorek, Gerald F. (1988). "Landslides, floods, and marine effects of the storm of January 3–5, 1982, in the San Francisco Bay Region, California". U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1434. Retrieved 3 March 2012.
  9. ^ Jump up to: a b c "1986 Flood Disaster". Archived from the original on 2007-10-21. Retrieved 2007-10-22.
  10. ^ Jump up to: a b c "Summary of Significant Floods in the United States, 1986". U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Kansas Water Science Center. Retrieved 2007-10-22.
  11. Jump up ^ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napa_River_flood_of_1986
  12. ^ Jump up to: a b "1986 Flood Victims To Get Millions". KCRA 3. Retrieved 2007-10-22.
  13. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g Aftermath of the 1997 Flood: Summary of a Workshop
  14. Jump up ^ "Sacramento Flood Risk". Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA). Retrieved 2007-10-22.

Related links

This page was last modified on 22 January 2014 at 01:11.
end quote from:

Ukraine

What's going on with Putin?

Could he be perceived as another type of Hitler because of his actions in Syria and Ukraine?

I think this depends upon what he does now and into the future more than what he has done in the past up until now.

It also depends upon what the United Nations and the world do in response to what Putin is doing now.

There is a saying Russian Generals have always subscribed to and it is: "Push the bayonet in and if there is no resistance keep on pushing but if you feel resistance then pull back."

And this is what is presently going on now. In other words imagine Russia as a bully bullying people. If no one stops him he will continue to get worse and worse. This is likely the case now as well.

However, since Russia still has nuclear weapons the way this is done is important too.

I heard a good statement today which is: "Don't bring a Baguette to a knife fight" which is what Obama might be doing now as well as most of Europe and NATO.

The problem is that if there is only nuclear war or nothing else, Putin wins. There must be consequences for Putin in order for him to stop and back off short of threats of Nuclear WAR. Otherwise, why would he stop with Ukraine?

Why wouldn't he move through Europe taking back one country at a time into a new Soviet Union of sorts?