TV Cable Boxes figured into Biggest Internet Attack ever

Devices Like Cable Boxes Figured in Internet Attack

By NICOLE PERLROTH

Published: March 29, 2013

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Google+
• Save
• E-mail
• Share
• Print
• Single Page
• Reprints
• 

SAN FRANCISCO — In the aftermath this week of one of the most powerful attacks on the Internet, finger-pointing quickly ensued.

Enlarge This Image

Jim Wilson/The New York Times

Paul Vixie of Internet Software Consortium is studying how online attacks work.

• Graphic: How the Cyberattack on Spamhaus Unfolded

Related

• Provocateur Comes Into View After Cyberattack (March 30, 2013)

• Bits Blog: Dispute on Spam Stirs Big Assault on the Internet (March 27, 2013)

More Tech Coverage

News from the technology industry, including start-ups, the Internet, enterprise and gadgets.
On Twitter: @nytimesbits.

The organization most suspected, victims said, was Stophaus, an elusive group of disgruntled European Internet users, although Sven Olaf Kamphuis, its spokesman, denied he was responsible for the attacks. At the same time, he shifted blame to Russian Internet service providers, which he said were retaliating against Spamhaus, a European anti-spam group, for blacklisting them.

But the real enablers of the attack were the operators of more than 27 million computers around the globe who left their equipment wide open to a motivated attacker. Those enablers are not just companies, but regular people with home cable boxes.

“There is a big possibility that you are part of the problem without even knowing it,” said Paul Vixie, chairman of the Internet Software Consortium, a nonprofit company responsible for the software used by many of the servers that power the Internet.

The servers the attackers used — what the Internet community calls open recursive servers or, more commonly, open resolvers — are simply home Internet devices, corporate servers, or virtual machines in the cloud that have been sloppily configured to accept messages from any device around the globe.

Open resolvers have been set up in such a way that they are not unlike the naïve users of public Wi-Fi who forget to turn off their file-sharing settings, so that any hacker on the Internet can creep inside the computer. It’s similar to PC users who do not realize that by not updating their software, they let their computers get infected with malware and used as a zombie in a cyberattack.

The difference is that if you think of a computer as a digital weapon, then an open resolver is a machine gun. Attackers can use open resolvers to amplify the strength of a cyberattack by a factor of 100.

In this week’s attack on Spamhaus and the company hired to fight it, CloudFlare, attackers made use of more than 100,000 open resolvers to inflict an attack that reached 300 billion bits per second, the largest such attack ever reported. When they could not take down those targets, they aimed and fired open resolvers at the world’s major Internet exchanges, first London, then Amsterdam, Frankfurt and then Hong Kong.

“At some point, we thought, ‘They are going to hit everything at once, and that’s when this gets real,’ ” said Matthew Prince, the chief executive of CloudFlare. “That’s the nightmare scenario that hasn’t happened — yet.”

“We’ve now seen an attack that begins to illustrate the full extent of the problem,” Mr. Prince wrote in a blog post.

Closing an open resolver, unfortunately, is not as simple as flipping a switch or downloading some software. Finding out if your home cable box is an open resolver, for instance, requires you to call your cable company and tell them that you do not want to be running an open resolver — a tough request when most of the world’s population does not even know what an open resolver is.

Recent efforts have been made to increase awareness of the issue. Computer security experts have recently started “naming and shaming” the operators of open resolvers. The DNS Measurement Factory, one such group, published a survey of top offenders by network, and more recently the Open Resolver Project published a full list of the 27 million open servers online.

The campaign is making slow progress; thousands dropped off those lists in the last few months.

But Dr. Vixie calls the open resolvers just the low-hanging fruit. Even if they were all fixed tomorrow, there are other types of servers that could just as easily be used to amplify an attack, a fact that hackers are eager to point out.

• 1
• 2

Next Page »

end quote from:

 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/30/technology/devices-like-cable-boxes-figured-in-internet-attack.html?partner=yahoofinance

Like it says above if you changed all the open resolvers and Servers around the world to not be vulnerable it is quite likely you would end the Internet as we now know it. This is why I think you might begin to see National Firewalls around nations or even Areas like States to protect local cyber Infrastructure from this type of thing. However, if this is done it will end the Internet at least as we now know it in the free world. However, after people did what they did last week I don't think governments and businesses want to see this sort of thing happen again and affect their businesses and bottom lines the way this did. This cost everyone a lot of money that does business over the Internet.