However, there are other problems that might arise like mold on the inside of the likely Plexiglas tubes because of all the water you would have to spray along with all the sunlight penetrating the tubes. Also, Solar heating of the tubes could be a problem too so there is a possibility that the Plexiglas tubes might need Mylar wrapped around them to reduce heating in the summers or unusual heat during the fall, winter or spring. Or I suppose you could have something fancy like a tube that on the top half or more changes like some prescription sunglasses to a more sunglasses effect as the sun gets brighter. In this way the passengers could still see out and not get claustrophobia which might be a problem otherwise. Another idea would be a metal cover like an aluminum roof that sheds rain, snow, and sunlight to reduce heat inside the tubes and also allows the passengers still able to see out the lower half of the tubes where they would be sitting and traveling. Also, lastly the kind of accident we just saw in Spain would not ever happen because the vehicle is enclosed 360 degrees so that type of accident you would never see.
However, you might see accidents where there are earthquakes and then the vehicle might shoot out the broken tube at 700 miles per hour or if a tube is thrown off by about a foot in relation to the next section the vehicle exploding at 700 miles per hour. However, this might be a quick way to go. Any way you look at it if there is any accident at that speed no one would survive. However, if the engines cut off for any reason like a major power outage people could just go out the escape hatch, find a drain hole and climb down the ladder there for emergencies unless the tube was already built close enough to the ground to just jump down.
End note.
I wrote the following before I had given enough thought to the idea above. However, since I wrote some pretty interesting things I decided to leave it even though they are more pre-thoughts than fully engineered thoughts. So, they too, might help engineers of this new technology.
When anyone approaches a mechanical contrivance to engineer it, it is also important to bring into play, "Whatever can go wrong will go wrong at some point." Using this principle in design is paramount to the potential success of the design. When I look at something going 700 mph in a vacuum tube that takes 35 minutes to go from Los Angeles to San Francisco what I think about is: "What happens if someone blows up the tube?", and "What happens if a vehicle gets stopped in a malfunction in the tube with people in it?
For example, "What happens if the engine gives out or there is a power outage and people are in a tube that is in a vaccuum state?" There are people in the vehicle but how do they get out to the outside without having their lungs sucked out of their mouths or suffocating from the vacuum in the tube?"
I have no doubt that a tube like this could work quite well and maybe even much more efficiently than present mag-lev trains. In fact, I have been reading science fiction short and long stories that including this type of technology since the 1950s. However, how do you get out of it without dying when it is 115 or 120 degrees outside when there is a vacuum outside your vehicle with no visible egress to the outside?
Until these really basic problems are solved I'm not going to be riding ever in something like this.
Hyperloop vs. world's fastest trains
(CNN) -- Just how fast would the Hyperloop transportation system envisioned by entrepreneur Elon Musk have to be? Try more than twice as ...
|
No comments:
Post a Comment