UT study sees link of wells, quakes
begin quote from above article button:UT study sees link of wells, quakes
By Jennifer A. Dlouhy
Published 9:52 p.m., Monday, August 6, 2012
- The Strength to RebuildCalifornia Earthquake Authority - Insurance info, tips & resources. www.EarthquakeAuthority.com
- Need Motorcycle Oil?Castrol.com has a wide collection of High Quality Motorcyyle Oils. www.castrol.com
Comments (
Printable Version
Email This
Font
Most recent earthquakes in North Texas happened close to
injection wells used to dispose of wastewater from oil and gas drilling
in the region, according to new research.
A two-year study by the University of Texas at Austin also found that the relatively minor temblors happened more often than indicated in previous investigations.
The UT study, published this week in "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences," is the latest to suggest a link between drilling and seismic activity.
"You can't prove that any one earthquake was caused by an injection well," said Cliff Frohlich, the University of Texas researcher who conducted the study. "But it's obvious that wells are enhancing the probability that earthquakes will occur."
A
U.S. Geological Survey report released earlier this year found that an
increase in small temblors throughout the Midwest coincides with the
injection of drilling wastewater in deep disposal wells. An Ohio state
agency concluded in March that a wastewater injection well was
responsible for a dozen earthquakes in Youngstown last year. And in
June, the National Research Council
released a report concluding that while there is a low risk of
earthquakes directly tied to oil and gas drilling techniques,
underground wastewater injections pose a higher risk of triggering
seismic activity.
Drilling companies have said they do not believe earthquakes are linked to injection wells.
The wells store wastewater from hydraulic fracturing, a technique that involves pumping mixtures of water, sand and chemicals underground to release natural gas and oil trapped in dense rock formations.
About a third of the water that is pumped underground emerges as "flowback" water before a well starts producing. Later, the well discharges a briny, metal-laden "produced" water that comes from the formation itself.
The wastewater sometimes goes to municipal treatment plants or is saved for reuse at future sites but also commonly is injected underground.
Frohlich's research focused on seismic data from the Barnett Shale region of Texas from November 2009 to September 2011. He concluded that the most reliably pinpointed earthquakes occurring during that time were in eight groups, all within two miles of one or more injection wells.
That's a change from earlier studies that associated two earthquake groups in the area with specific injection wells.
But his data also show disparities. In some cases where drillers rapidly disposed of wastewater underground, there were temblors nearby. But in other cases with similar circumstances, there were no resulting quakes.
Frohlich speculated the difference may be that wastewater injected in some wells reaches existing faults.
Some of the earthquakes were too small to feel on the surface; others, as high as 2.5 in magnitude, were still too light to pose any real danger, the study said.
Although Frohlich's research focused on the Barnett Shale, recent rumblings in the Eagle Ford formation also have drawn attention. A magnitude 4.8 earthquake rattled central and south Texas last October - followed by a magnitude 3.3 quake in November. Neither was linked with injection wells or drilling in the region, but they stoked fears of fracturing-tied tremors.
Federal regulations governing drilling - including newly proposed mandates for hydraulically fractured wells on public lands - have not tackled the issue head-on. But some states already have moved to address it. Ohio officials, for example, responded to the Youngstown quakes by imposing new permitting requirements and geological mandates on drillers.
Kevin Book, an analyst with ClearView Energy Partners, said this year that he anticipates Texas and other states that are accustomed to oil and gas exploration will have measured, "pragmatic" responses - including moving disposal wells.
jennifer.dlouhy@chron.com
end quote from:
A two-year study by the University of Texas at Austin also found that the relatively minor temblors happened more often than indicated in previous investigations.
The UT study, published this week in "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences," is the latest to suggest a link between drilling and seismic activity.
"You can't prove that any one earthquake was caused by an injection well," said Cliff Frohlich, the University of Texas researcher who conducted the study. "But it's obvious that wells are enhancing the probability that earthquakes will occur."
- Spokane Preparedness ExpoSept. 30 - Spokane Convention Ctr Get discounts and specials here www.SustainablePreparedness.com
- Earthquake Survival KitsStay Safe 72 Hours After Disaster Buy Directly from the Manufacturer. www.QuakeKare.com
- Emergency Mgmt. DegreeEarn an emergency management degree online at AMU. Enroll now. www.AMU.APUS.edu/EmergencyMgmt
- Route 66 in OklahomaGet your kicks on Route 66 for an epic road trip in Oklahoma! www.TravelOK.com
Drilling companies have said they do not believe earthquakes are linked to injection wells.
The wells store wastewater from hydraulic fracturing, a technique that involves pumping mixtures of water, sand and chemicals underground to release natural gas and oil trapped in dense rock formations.
About a third of the water that is pumped underground emerges as "flowback" water before a well starts producing. Later, the well discharges a briny, metal-laden "produced" water that comes from the formation itself.
The wastewater sometimes goes to municipal treatment plants or is saved for reuse at future sites but also commonly is injected underground.
Frohlich's research focused on seismic data from the Barnett Shale region of Texas from November 2009 to September 2011. He concluded that the most reliably pinpointed earthquakes occurring during that time were in eight groups, all within two miles of one or more injection wells.
That's a change from earlier studies that associated two earthquake groups in the area with specific injection wells.
But his data also show disparities. In some cases where drillers rapidly disposed of wastewater underground, there were temblors nearby. But in other cases with similar circumstances, there were no resulting quakes.
Frohlich speculated the difference may be that wastewater injected in some wells reaches existing faults.
Some of the earthquakes were too small to feel on the surface; others, as high as 2.5 in magnitude, were still too light to pose any real danger, the study said.
Although Frohlich's research focused on the Barnett Shale, recent rumblings in the Eagle Ford formation also have drawn attention. A magnitude 4.8 earthquake rattled central and south Texas last October - followed by a magnitude 3.3 quake in November. Neither was linked with injection wells or drilling in the region, but they stoked fears of fracturing-tied tremors.
Federal regulations governing drilling - including newly proposed mandates for hydraulically fractured wells on public lands - have not tackled the issue head-on. But some states already have moved to address it. Ohio officials, for example, responded to the Youngstown quakes by imposing new permitting requirements and geological mandates on drillers.
Kevin Book, an analyst with ClearView Energy Partners, said this year that he anticipates Texas and other states that are accustomed to oil and gas exploration will have measured, "pragmatic" responses - including moving disposal wells.
jennifer.dlouhy@chron.com
end quote from:
No comments:
Post a Comment