My most liberal and most conservative points of view

I would like to demonstrate why I am an independent and a free thinker. My responses are all logical but don't just fit into a Conservative or Liberal mold.

My most conservative point of view is that I believe all sane U.S. citizens should have at least a pistol and a rifle to defend themselves.

Why?

Because most of the time the police and the Sheriffs departments can't defend us because they are either too far away or busy doing something else. So, we as citizens need to be ready to defend ourselves all the time.

Also, when America disarms as an intuitive I can promise you democracy will be over planet wide within 75 years. The likely consequence of Americans disarming will be a world wide dictatorship within 75 years.

My most liberal point of view is that I believe anyone that practices birth control worldwide is entitled to food, shelter and clothing. This is my most liberal point of view. So, anyone who believes people should only replace themselves should be entitled to food, shelter and clothing worldwide.

So, these are the two extremes and both are completely logical to me in my thinking because of everything I have read and have experienced my whole lifetime.

Police and armies do not in the end preserve democracies. Only the people the electorate can do that and that is why they need to be armed. We are one of the last armed democracies on earth. When we lose that just expect a worldwide dictatorship or the world to end in nukes (one or the other).

The U.S. could not have ever come to be without an armed electorate, nor can it be long preserved without one either. This is just being realistic as opposed to being an idealist. But, in the end who defends the idealists?

An Armed populace.

Likewise, the world cannot long exist until all people's respect and only replace themselves. Otherwise the whole world will become such a hell that no one would want to be alive and to live through that.

So, my second position is to reward people who prevent global holocaust by only replacing themselves ongoing thereby stabilizing earth's population at a certain level never to grow again.

Because we have seen the alternative to this in the Middle East where one religion or philosophy kills all the others. When there are too many people for an ecosystem to maintain there are not enough jobs so some people become desperate and become criminals or terrorists (same thing) so they can survive a little longer.

So, to prevent this we should only reward people who practice birth control worldwide thereby stabilizing world populations at some point short of human extinction.