Friday, February 14, 2014

Syria Peace Talks Deadlock as Recriminations Fly

Syria Peace Talks Deadlock as Recriminations Fly

New York Times - ‎6 hours ago‎
GENEVA - The second round of Syria peace talks deadlocked in acrimony and frustration on Friday, as the government delegation appeared to rule out any compromise with the opposition, throwing the future of the negotiations into more doubt.
Brahimi: Syria peace talks' failure looms
Syrian peace talks going nowhere
Progress in Geneva is slow, but it's still Syria's best chance of peace
Syrian Delegates Declare Impasse in Peace Talks
Launch media viewer
A man holds a baby in his arms following a reported airstrike in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo on Friday. Fadi Al-Halabi/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
GENEVA — The second round of Syria peace talks deadlocked in acrimony and frustration on Friday, as the government delegation appeared to rule out any compromise with the opposition, throwing the future of the negotiations into more doubt.
Members of the opposition delegation called on the United States and Russia, the two major sponsors of the talks, to find ways to move forward, and said there was a small possibility of a final meeting between the antagonists on Saturday. But the prevailing mood was grim.
The impasse in Geneva came as the United Nations human rights office warned of new deprivations and civilian uprooting inside Syria and antigovernment activists in the country reported new mayhem, including a large car bombing in the south that killed dozens and the execution of 21 people carried out by Al Qaeda-linked jihadists in the north.
There had been some hope that the second round of talks in Geneva, which began on Monday, would make some progress on an agenda aimed at ending the nearly three-year-old conflict or at least finding a way to allow unfettered humanitarian aid to reach hundreds of thousands of Syrian civilians in combat zones.
Launch media viewer
Lakhdar Brahimi, the United Nations mediator for Syria, arriving for peace talks in Geneva on Friday. Philippe Desmazes/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
The opposition delegation offered what appeared to be a significant compromise, or at least a softened tone, on Wednesday. While asserting in a 24-point proposal that the talks focus on creating a transitional government, the opposition’s language, for the first time, did not specifically demand that President Bashar al-Assad be excluded from such a government.
But Mr. Assad’s negotiators, who have insisted that the talks should focus on fighting terrorism, did not even read the compromise, diplomats said.
Fayssal Mekdad, Syria’s deputy foreign minister and lead negotiator in the talks, said on Friday that all those who “carry arms against their people and their government are terrorists,” a position that appeared to rule out any common ground with Mr. Assad’s opponents.
Mr. Mekdad also rebuked Valerie Amos, the United Nations relief coordinator, over her report to the Security Council on Wednesday. Although she blamed all sides for obstructing efforts to provide emergency food and medicine to Syrian civilians, she used her strongest language yet, denouncing attacks on aid workers and accusing both the government and the insurgents of flagrant violations of humanitarian law.

Crisis in Syria

  • News, analysis and photos of the conflict that has left more than 100,000 dead and millions displaced.
    Full Coverage »
Mr. Mekdad called Ms. Amos’s comments “unacceptable,” signaling a new tension over the relief issue.
The Syrian opposition, backed by the United States and other Western powers, has accused Mr. Assad’s side of deliberately denying aid to civilians as part of a broader strategy to starve the insurgency into submission. But efforts to coerce the government to allow aid through a binding United Nations Security Council resolution are considered unclear at best.
Frustration has reached the point where John Kerry, the American secretary of state, said during a visit to China on Friday that President Obama had asked aides to develop new policy options on Syria.
Mr. Kerry did not elaborate on such options, but his remarks were seen as a possible effort to pressure Russia, Mr. Assad’s principal defender, to exert more influence on the Syrian government side.
Launch media viewer
Louay Safi, a spokesman for Syria's main opposition group, at a news briefing in Geneva on Friday. Salvatore Di Nolfi/KEYSTONE, via Associated Press
Russian officials, for their part, accused the Syrian opposition’s Western backers on Friday of focusing solely on “regime change,” suggesting that Russia was unwilling or unable to soften the Syrian government’s negotiating position. Russian diplomats say they are not committed to maintaining Mr. Assad’s hold on power, but they insist on continuity in the government.
The United Nations diplomat who has been mediating the talks, Lakhdar Brahimi, signaled his own frustration with the Syrian government side on Thursday, according to two Western diplomats.
Mr. Brahimi, they said, had complained that the Syrian delegation refused to even touch, let alone read, the 24-point plan presented by the opposition on Wednesday. Instead, they said, the government delegates left the paper on the table and walked away.
The inability to even agree on an agenda was “a very bad omen” for the Geneva process, one Western diplomat said.
Play Video
Video|3:21
Ahmad Aboud/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

The Syrian Opposition, Explained

There are believed to be hundreds, if not thousands, of groups fighting in Syria. These opposition groups are fighting the Assad regime, but recently turned on each other with increased ferocity.
“We expected that the talks would be difficult,” he said. “We didn’t expect that they would be unable to compromise on an agenda, and that, frankly, is not good.”
Mr. Brahimi, he said, might call off the third round if he is concerned about his personal credibility in presiding over an empty process.
But other Western diplomats here noted that Mr. Brahimi is famously patient and that the Russians would not welcome a collapse of the talks, particularly if it happened during the Winter Olympic Games underway in Sochi.
At the United Nations on Friday, Security Council diplomats said they would meet later to discuss two competing draft resolutions on Syrian humanitarian aid: one from Russia, and a more strongly worded one from Australia, Jordan and Luxembourg. There was some hope that they could be reconciled, but the prospects were unclear.
In Syria, antigovernment activists and state television reported a car bomb exploded in the southern town of Yadouda near the Jordanian border. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based group with a network of contacts in the country, said at least 32 people were killed including 10 insurgents and a child.
The group also said the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, a particularly violent Al Qaeda splinter group that has antagonized others in the Syrian insurgency, had executed 17 rival rebel fighters in the town of Haritan, northwest of Aleppo, and thrown their corpses into a well. Four others were reported beheaded in Azaz, another town north of Aleppo.
The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, known by its acronym ISIS, has been increasingly blamed for worsening relations among anti-Assad group. Even the leader of Al Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahri, has denounced the group for its violent methods. Earlier this month Al Qaeda’s central leadership officially cut ties with ISIS.
Anne Barnard reported from Geneva, and Rick Gladstone from New York. Reporting was contributed by Somini Sengupta from the United Nations and Michael R. Gordon from New York.
end quote from:

Syria Peace Talks Deadlock as Recriminations Fly

No comments: