The policies of the U.S. must be viewed with this in mind. So, the U.S. is the most worried about possible Iranian Nukes. That Iran will eventually have nuclear weapons is a no-brainer I believe at this point. The only thing is "When". That's it.
So, it is better that the U.S. can continue to have a dialog with Iran for when that time comes it appears. For this reason it is likely that the U.S. has decided it would rather have Assad as leader in Syria than ISIS (which appears to be the actual choice unfortunately)
So, what does this mean for Sunni Nations?
I'm not sure. I don't think the U.S. is backing off alliances with the Sunni nations either. It is mostly about trying to be friends with as many as possible to avoid future nuclear war. The U.S. also could be positioning itself as a future negotiator between Shiites and Sunnis in both the near and Far Future.
This to me is what presently appears to be going on.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Because of fighting in Ukraine and Israel Bombing Iran I thought I should share this EMP I wrote in 2011
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- Keri Russell pulls back the curtain on "The Diplomat" (season 2 filming now for Netflix)
- most read articles from KYIV Post
- Historicity of Jesus-Wikipedia
- reprint of: Drones very small to large
- US intelligence officials make last-ditch effort to sound the alarm over foreign election interference
- The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article
- When I began to write "A Journey through Time"
- Jack Ryan from Prime (4 seasons)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment