The policies of the U.S. must be viewed with this in mind. So, the U.S. is the most worried about possible Iranian Nukes. That Iran will eventually have nuclear weapons is a no-brainer I believe at this point. The only thing is "When". That's it.
So, it is better that the U.S. can continue to have a dialog with Iran for when that time comes it appears. For this reason it is likely that the U.S. has decided it would rather have Assad as leader in Syria than ISIS (which appears to be the actual choice unfortunately)
So, what does this mean for Sunni Nations?
I'm not sure. I don't think the U.S. is backing off alliances with the Sunni nations either. It is mostly about trying to be friends with as many as possible to avoid future nuclear war. The U.S. also could be positioning itself as a future negotiator between Shiites and Sunnis in both the near and Far Future.
This to me is what presently appears to be going on.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Blank Link Code for HTML Language
- The Womb of God
- Ukrainian drones hit St Petersburg as Putin's flagship economic forum opens: full article
- Former Trump adviser John Bolton to plead guilty to retaining national security info
- The Screen door with Gray duct tape?
- Most read articles as of Thursday June 4th 2026
- Part of Medical PTSD can be that you do not believe then that you are going to survive what you are going through
- Moderation in all things
- Senate begins vote on Republican bill to fund ICE as GOP is split on Trump’s $1.8B fund
- Republican-led House votes to rebuke Trump over war with Iran: Full Article
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment