begin quote from:
4 times in 4 days: Russians fly off US coast
4 times in 4 days: Russian military aircraft fly off US coast
Story highlights
- The two most recent sightings occurred late Wednesday and on Thursday
- Russian aircraft have also been spotted recently flying near the coastline of US allies, including Japan
Washington (CNN)Russian
military aircraft were spotted flying off the coast of Alaska for the
fourth time in as many days, a spokesperson for the North American
Aerospace Defense Command told CNN on Friday.
The
two most recent sightings occurred late Wednesday and on Thursday, with
the first involving two IL-38 maritime patrol aircraft and the second
involving two Tu-95 nuclear-capable Bear bombers.
Russian
aircraft never entered US airspace but US F-22s and Canadian CF-18s
jets were dispatched to perform an intercept during Thursday's
encounter, according to NORAD.
"Obviously
-- we are aware of it," White House press secretary Sean Spicer told
reporters on Friday. "This is not highly unusual ... but we monitor
everything."
On Thursday, the
bombers entered the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone 700 nautical
miles southwest of Anchorage -- significantly farther from the US
coastline than two other encounters that occurred on Monday and Tuesday.
The
Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone is a designated region of
international airspace, primarily surrounding the US and Canada, that is
meant as a buffer to allow for the identification of aircraft heading
towards North America.
While these
flights pose no real military threat, US defense officials are taking
notice of the high frequency at which they've occurred this week.
There is "no other way to interpret this other than as strategic messaging," one official told CNN.
While
the Russians have not conducted flights of this nature since 2015,
another senior defense official stressed that they are "not a concern"
and attributed the uptick to a recent lack of available Russian aircraft
and need to boost training.
"We
haven't seen this sort of level of activity for a couple of years," said
John Cornelio, a NORAD spokesperson, though he emphasized it was not
"unprecedented" or "unusual."
This
"shows the value of NORAD and that binational US and Canada
relationship," he said, pointing to the two nations working together to
identify and intercept the Russian long-range aircraft.
Earlier
in the week, US defense officials called recent sightings of the
bombers "nothing out of the ordinary" -- itself an indication that both
nations are toeing the line between routine military posturing and
escalating provocation.
On Monday,
US F-22 fighter jets intercepted two Russian bombers in international
airspace 100 miles from Kodiak Island, Alaska. A US military official
called the interaction "safe and professional."
Less than 24 hours later,
a US surveillance aircraft responded to two Russian bombers that were
spotted in the same area, this time flying 41 miles off Alaska.
The US itself has carried out similar flights along both the Chinese and Russian coasts.
Part of larger strategy
Moscow,
for its part, said it "regularly carries out patrol missions above the
neutral waters of the Arctic, the Atlantic, the Black Sea and the
Pacific Ocean."
"All such missions
are carried out in strict compliance with international regulations and
with respect to national borders," the Russian Defense Ministry said in a
written statement.
But this week's
encounter plays into a larger effort by Russian President Vladimir
Putin "to prove Russia is back in the game," according to Howard
Stoffer, a former State Department staffer.
"This
kind of cat-and-mouse stuff has been going on for a while now," Stoffer
told CNN, adding that Putin "is trying to put the US on notice that the
Russians are everywhere and are back to expanding the limits of
expanding their military power."
"It
is one thing when you fly to be noticed," he said. "When the Russians
buzz US ships, that is an unprofessional action because upsets the
operation and is dangerous for all parties involved ... that is where
the line that is drawn."
US officials have echoed Stoffer's stance as recently as February, after the USS Porter had three encounters with Russian aircraft while sailing in the Black Sea.
Those
encounters were deemed unsafe and unprofessional because of how close
the Russian planes flew to the American destroyer, a senior defense
official said at the time.
Moscow denied that its aircraft had made any unsafe moves.
Russian
aircraft have also been spotted recently flying near the coastline of
US allies, including Japan, which has scrambled fighter jets four times
this month in response, according to a statement from the Japanese
Foreign Ministry.
The Viktor Leonov, a Russian spy ship, has also been spotted near the US coastline twice in recent months.
Rising tensions between US and Russia are a far cry from President Donald Trump's optimistic campaign rhetoric of
hopes for a collaborative relationship. As Trump himself said earlier
this month, relations between the former Cold War foes "may be at an
all-time low."
The two nations have clashed over deeply rooted strategic differences this month.
Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad's alleged April 4 chemical weapons attack on
his own civilians triggered Trump's outrage, leading him to strike a
Syrian airfield with Tomahawk missiles, and witnessed a change in Trump's stance on Russia, which has supported Assad throughout Syria's bloody civil war.
Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that the US missile strikes on an
airfield in Syria were a failed attempt to try to undermine the peace
process in the country and to change the regime.
And Russia has stood with Iran, a long-time US foe, in condemning the strikes.
"Attempts
of this kind will never be a success. It will never happen," Lavrov
said during a joint news conference with the Iranian and Syrian foreign
ministers in Moscow. "We demand that the United States should respect
the sovereignty of a state and avoid such actions that threaten the
current world order."
Opposing views on the conflict in Ukraine have also become a hot-button issue between the Kremlin and the new US administration.
In
February, Russia's Foreign Ministry also indicated that it intends to
keep Crimea and not return it to Ukraine because it considers it to be
part of Russia -- a stance that the Trump administration has said it
directly opposes.
White House press secretary Sean Spicer said earlier this year
that Trump had been taking a tough line with Russia and that he
expected Moscow to withdraw from the region, which it has occupied since
2014.
The US, meanwhile, has positioned military assets across Europe in an effort to reassure its European and NATO allies in the wake of Russia's movements in Ukraine.
Over the weekend, the US Air Force sent its newest stealth fighters to the United Kingdom in a demonstration of its military reach.
This
week's encounters might be routine military chest-thumping, but the
countries' entwinement in complex military situations around the world
raises the risk of escalation.
American
forces have so far refrained from engaging Russian aircraft after
they've performed maneuvers like buzzing Navy ships. But Stoffer
indicated retaliation could be possible in the future.
According
to Stoffer, it is unlikely that the US would go to the extreme of
firing a shot across the bow of a Russian ship or shooting down a
Russian jet carrying out an unsafe move.
But
he could see a scenario in which a US commander greenlights alternative
responses like jamming the aircraft's radar and avionics systems --
which could cause the aircraft to crash.
If
a minor provocation were to escalate and turn into a larger-scale war
situation, Moscow would be at a disadvantage, according to retired Air
Force Gen. Michael Hayden.
"No one
wants to go to war with the Russians, but let me double down on another
concept: The Russians really don't want to go to war with us," said
Hayden, the CIA and National Security Agency director under President
George W. Bush, during an interview on CNN's "Erin Burnett OutFront."
"They are by far the weaker power," he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment