Sunday's 5.2 quake where geology 'starts to get quite complicated'
GEONET
Sunday's 5.2-magnitude earthquake was widely felt.
Sunday's magnitude 5.2 quake near Nelson happened at a depth where the geology "starts to get quite complicated", a seismologist says.
GeoNet received more than 8100 felt reports for the 3.14pm earthquake, which was centred 20 kilometres east of Nelson at a depth of 73km.
"It's not like your typical earthquake rupturing on a fault," GNS Science duty seismologist Dr John Ristau said.
It was hard to tell what happened in this case. In that area of the upper South Island, the Pacific Plate was pushing down beneath the Australian Plate.
READ MOIRE:
* Magnitude 5.2 earthquake shakes lower North Island
* Megathrust quake could bring 12m-high tsunami waves
* Here's what a decade of NZ quakes looks like in 20 seconds
* Alpine Fault moves more than any other known land fault in the world
* Magnitude 5.2 earthquake shakes lower North Island
* Megathrust quake could bring 12m-high tsunami waves
* Here's what a decade of NZ quakes looks like in 20 seconds
* Alpine Fault moves more than any other known land fault in the world
Earthquakes such as the event on Sunday could happen on the interface between the two plates, but that was unlikely in this case, Ristau said.
"So (it happened) either on the Australian Plate, fairly deep, or on the subducting slab of the Pacific Plate. They can occur for various reasons."
As the subducting slab went deeper it became hotter, "so the rocks start to change and start to go through transformation to different rock types, and they become more plastic almost."
If one area of rock started to melt, while the area around it was more solid, then there could be a collapse.
"It starts to get quite complicated down there," Ristau said.
While being widely felt, Sunday's quake wasn't particularly big. Similar events happened every year or two.
Because of its size and depth there were limits to the amount of investigation that could be carried out.
"If it was bigger, we would have more information to go on, and there would be more of an impetus to look into it," Ristau said.
The data that was available might be fed into models being developed for long term earthquake forecasting.
- Stuff
No comments:
Post a Comment