Saturday, May 1, 2021

Smallholding: Wikipedia

For example, I still have two different friends in the Mt. Shasta area that grow about 75% of everything they eat during the year. Each has 2 1/2 acres of land and a well and one is solar and one has electricity from the grid. But, these days as long as you have enough water and your house is built and paid for all you have to pay then is taxes on your land yearly and whatever utilities and your water bills to have most of your expenses covered at any age.
a

begin quote from:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smallholding

Smallholding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Diversified Crop Choices
Women smallholder farmers in Kenya

A smallholding or smallholder is a small farm operating under a small-scale agriculture model.[1] Definitions vary widely for what constitutes a smallholder or small-scale farm, including factors such as size, food production technique or technology, involvement of family in labor and economic impact.[2] Smallholdings are usually farms supporting a single family with a mixture of cash crops and subsistence farming. As a country becomes more affluent, smallholdings may not be self-sufficient, but may be valued for the rural lifestyle. As the sustainable food and local food movements grow in affluent countries, some of these smallholdings are gaining increased economic viability. There are an estimated 500 million smallholder farms in developing countries of the world alone, supporting almost two billion people.[3][4]

Small-scale agriculture is often in tension with industrial agriculture, which finds efficiencies by increasing outputs, monoculture, consolidating land under big agricultural operations, and economies of scale. Certain labor-intensive cash-crops, such as cocoa production in Ghana or Côte d'Ivoire, rely heavily on small holders; globally, as of 2008 90% of cocoa is grown by smallholders.[5] These farmers rely on cocoa for up to 60 to 90 per cent of their income. [6]Similar trends in supply chains exist in other crops like coffee, palm oil, and bananas.[7] In other markets, small scale agriculture can increase food system investment in small holders improving food security. Today some companies try to include smallholdings into their value chain, providing seed, feed or fertilizer to improve production. [8]

Because smallholding farms frequently require less industrial inputs and can be an important way to improve food security and sustainable food systems in less-developed contexts, addressing the productivity and financial sustainability of small holders is an international development priority and measured by indicator 2.3 of Sustainable Development Goal 2.[9][2] Additionally, since agriculture has such large impacts on climate change, Project Drawdown described "Sustainable Intensification for Smallholders" an important method for climate change mitigation.[10]

Issues[edit]

Productivity[edit]

According to conventional theory, economies of scale allows agricultural productivity, in terms of inputs versus outputs, to rise as the size of the farm rises. Specialisation has also been a major factor in increasing agricultural productivity, for example as commodity processing began to move off the farm in the 19th century, farmers could spend more effort in primary food production.[11]

Although numerous studies show that larger farms are more productive than smaller ones,[12] some writers state that whilst conventional farming creates a high output per worker, some small-scale, sustainable, polyculture farmers can produce more food per acre of land.[13]

Small farms have some economic advantages. Farmers support the local economy of their communities. An American study showed that small farms with incomes of $100,000 or less spend almost 95 percent of their farm-related expenses within their local communities. The same study took in comparison the fact that farms with incomes greater than $900,000 spend less than 20 percent of their farm-related expenses in the local economy.[14]

Small-scale agriculture often sell products directly to the consumers. Disintermediation gives the farmer the profit that would otherwise go to the wholesaler, the distributor and the supermarket. About two thirds of the selling price would actually be lost for product marketing. If farmers sell their products directly to consumers, they receive a higher percentage of the retail price, although they will spend more time selling the same amounts of product, which is an opportunity cost.

Food security[edit]

Because smallholding farms frequently require less industrial inputs and can be an important way to improve food security in less-developed contexts, addressing the productivity and financial sustainability of small holders is an international development priority and measured by indicator 2.3 of Sustainable Development Goal 2.[9][2] The International Fund for Agricultural Development has an ongoing program for Adaptation for Smallholder Agriculture.[15]

During the global COVID-19 pandemic, and the attendant disruptions of food systems, their role has become more important.[16]

Environmental and climate adaptation[edit]

While historical focus on smallholders has been increasing global food supply under climate change and the role played by smallholder communities, climate adaptation efforts are still hindered by lack of information on how smallholder farmers are experiencing and responding to climate change. There is lack of detailed, context-specific information on what climate change portends to smallholder farmers in different and widely varying agroecological environments and socio-economic realities, and what management strategies they are employing to deal with these impacts.[17][18]

Especially for smallholders working in commodity crops, climate change introduces an increasing amount of variability to farmer economic viability; for example, Coffee production globally is under increased threat, and smallholders in East Africa, such as in the Ugandan, Tanzanian or Kenyan industries, are rapidly losing both viable coffee land and productivity of plants.[19]

In some cases, smallholders are an important source of deforestation. For example, smallholders are an important component of the oil palm industry of Southeast Asia, contributing 40% of the production. Because such farmers are less able to access financing than larger businesses, they are unable to fund methods to increase the productivity of their farms when yields decline, increasing their need to clear more land.[20] Increasing productivity, especially amongst smallholder farms, is an important way to decrease the amount of land needed for farming and slow environmental degradation through processes like deforestation.[10][20]

Commonwealth countries[edit]

Smallholdings in Britain[edit]

In British English usage, a smallholding is a piece of land and its adjacent living quarters for the smallholder and stabling for farm animals. It is usually smaller than a farm but larger than an allotment, usually under 50 acres (20 ha). It is often established for breeding farm animals organically on free-range pastures. Alternatively, the smallholder may concentrate on growing vegetables by traditional methods or, in a more modern way, using plastic covers, polytunneling or cloches for quick growth.

Generally, a smallholding offers its owner a means of achieving self-sufficiency for its family's needs. They may be able to supplement their income by selling surplus produce at a farmers' market or at a permanent shop on the smallholding.

Hobby farms in Australia[edit]

In Western Australia, many small acre farms were established under the Agricultural Land Purchase Act to encourage settlement. The government purchased large land grants held by absentee owners and subdivided them according to the best use for the land: the development of orchids in Coondle, viticulture, horse breeding, sheep grazing, and high density crops like corn, and broad acre crops like wheat.

A hobby farm in Australia is a variety of smallholding that may be as small as 2 hectares up to a self-sustaining farm size, that allows the "city farmer" to have a house and a small number of animals or small crop fields or grape vines. In Western Australia, they are often termed Special Rural Properties for planning purposes.

Lifestyle blocks in New Zealand[edit]

In New Zealand, a lifestyle block is a smallholding valued primarily for the rural lifestyle it affords. Planning restrictions on subdividing farm land often lead to the creation of lifestyle blocks of minimum permissible size near urban areas.

Developing countries[edit]

In many developing countries, smallholding is a small plot of land with low rental value, used to grow crops.[21] By some estimates, there are 525 million smallholder farmers in the world.[22] These farms vary in land sizes, production and labor intensities.[23] The distribution of farm sizes depends on a number of agroecological and demographic conditions, as well as on economic and technological factors.[24] Smallholders are critical to local and regional food systems, as well as livelihoods, and especially so during periods of food supply chain disruptions.[25] Smallholders dominate production in certain key sectors such as coffee and cocoa. Various types of agribusinesses enterprises work with smallholding farmers in a range of roles including buying crops, providing seed, and acting as financial institutions.[26]

In low-income countries, women make up 43 percent of small holding agricultural labor, but produce 60–80 percent of food crops.[10]

India[edit]

In India there is a five sizes classification for small holders. These are 'marginal' less than 1ha, 'small' between 1 and 2ha, 'semi-medium' between 2 and 4ha, 'medium' between 4 and 10 ha, 'large' above 10ha. If we use 4ha (marginal + small + medium) as a threshold, 94.3% holdings are small and these constitute 65.2% of all farmland.[4] The bulk of India's hungry and poor people are constituted of small holder farmers and landless people. 78% country’s farmers own less than 2ha, which constitutes 33% of total farmland but at the same time they produce 41% of country’s food grains. 20% of world's poor live in India, although country was self sufficient in food production in 2002 due to first Green Revolution started in later half of twentieth century, numerous households lacked resources to purchase food. Holdings less than 2ha contributed 41% of total food grain production in 1991 compared to 28% in 1971, which means a substantial increase, whereas medium holdings registered mere 3% increase in same period and large holdings registered a decline from 51 to 35%. This signifies the importance of small holders in the Green Revolution and the attainment of national food security. Small holder families are becoming more vulnerable and more disadvantaged due to expansion of international trade liberalisation. Needs and aspirations of small farmers must feature prominently in policies of market reform that seek to improve food and nutritional security. India's total increase rate of productivity across the farming sector was far less in 1990's when compared to previous decades.[27]

Kenya[edit]

Kenya's smallholder production accounts for 78 percent of total agricultural production and 70 percent of commercial production.[28] Majority of the smallholder population work in farm sizes averaging 0.47 hectares.[29] This represents the vast majority of Kenya's rural poor population who depend on agriculture for their livelihood.[30] Adverse risk events during the period 1980–2012

African smallholder Dairy farmer

led to production losses in smallholder farms resulting in a drop in agricultural gross domestic product (GDP) of 2 percent or more.[30] Increasing the productivity of smallholder farmers is encouraged due to its potential of improving food availability, increasing rural incomes, lowering poverty rates, and growing the economy.[30] Diversification of crops in smallholder farms is one of the potential strategies in sustaining agricultural productivity, and copping with marketing risks.[31] It is also a transitional step from subsistence to commercial agriculture.[citation needed] Age, education of household head, type of crops, cropping system, amount of credit, and irrigation facilities are some of the factors influencing diversification in smallholder farms.[32]

Tanzania[edit]

Along the upper and middle reaches of the Nduruma River in the Pangani River Basin, Tanzania, there is not enough water to go around. Smallholder farmers address inequities in land and water distribution by enforcing existing traditional local rules. Whilst larger estate farms may have governmental licences guaranteeing rights to the water, a study found that those large-scale farms which adhere to the traditional water rights structures fare better in terms of social reputation, which better ensures their access to water. Adhering to the water law in order to enforce their permits is less effective, as regional Tanzanian local governments generally attempt to avoid conflict with their populace. On a larger scale, however, existing traditional rules are ineffective in maintaining cooperation among users along the Nduruma River.[33]

Thailand[edit]

In 1975, there were 4.2 million smallholder farming households in Thailand. In 2013, Thailand had 5.9 million smallholder farming households. The average area of these smallholdings had shrunk from 3.7 hectares to 3.2 hectares over that period. Instead of farms getting larger and less numerous, as has been the case in the Global North, the reverse happened: they got smaller and more numerous.[34]

See also[edit]

 

Looking at posts from 2007

I was reading a post from I believe 2007 called enrichment about a dream I had then which is always interesting. One of the reasons I like to write is that I can understand myself in many different ways. As I grow older I change somewhat over time so reading something you wrote 10, 20, 30 or 40 years ago is always interesting. The problems you were solving 40 years ago are usually not the same problems you are solving now in your life.

For example, in 1980 I was 32 years old married to my 2nd wife and was raising my son from my first marriage and her two kids from her first marriage too. So, the problems I was facing then were mainly financially covering everyone and my health was Great still. But, by 1998 when I had my heart virus and doctors couldn't figure out what was wrong with me to the point where they realized I might die I wasn't then dealing with financially covering everything like I was in 1980. By 1995 to 1998 we had moved into a much more successful life so finances weren't the problem that they were when I was supporting 3 children in 1980 when I had first married my 2nd wife. By 1995 I had remarried and in 1996 a daughter was born who is now 25 years old and living in Portland as is my son. 

So, reading what you have written at different times in your life is sort of like meeting many versions of yourself along the way which can be very interesting and enlightening as well.

Most of what I have kept of my writings

 is from 1980 to the present whether in printouts or online at websites or usually both. It's always good to have a printout of whatever you write simply because all you need is a Solar plasma storm on the sun and all your hard drives won't work any more if the solar ejection actually hits the earth. So, if you care about what you write at all it's good to have a backup for it somewhere where you live or work on paper. But, best of all would be a printout on paper that you keep at home or in a safe somewhere. There are only two things that would survive a solar storm that hits earth that is as big as the Carrington event of 1859. One of them is a DVD and the other is a printout because ALL magnetic media within 10 feet of the surface of the earth would likely be gone unless  under 10 feet deep in a cement or dirt bunker somewhere.

Although it's also likely that all jet passenger planes in the air would likely all crash if they were on the side of the planet where the solar flare hit if it was strong enough and all electric cars and hybrids would also stop working maybe permanently until parts that were fried by the solar flare could be replaced by parts that weren't hit on the other side of the planet. So, theoretically it could be months before electric cars or hybrids worked again. Even in regular cars the digital circuit boards might also fry to where only cars built before 1970 would actually work before they changed points in cars to digital chips instead.

However, the military wires most vehicles for land, sea and air with wiring that doesn't get corrupted by Solar or Nuclear Blasts in an EMP


Comedy and politics: USA politics compared to South African Politics?

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOkpIQfdkdo

Why do back to the land movements often form historically?

Because cities are not the best place to raise children safely necessarily. There are many points of view regarding all this and I can speak to some of them myself because I too, bought land in a remote place to home school my own older children around 1980 even though the back to the land movement actually started in the late 1960s. Our experience came when there were too many children at Sisson Elementary school that year so they moved the 4th to the 6th grades to the Junior High School. Immediately an 8th grader broke a 4th graders jaw because children that far apart in age don't necessarily get along that well if they are not related. So, in protest we removed our three children from school and bought land and moved remotely and used Independent learning modules to home school our children through:

About 26,700,000 results (1.07 seconds) 

 

Links to Most read articles as of Saturday May 1st 2021

 

The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article

 

reprint of: Drones very small to large

 

2011 Japan earthquake and tsunami - Wikipedia: 6 years and 1 month ago: 15,894 deaths over 8,000 injured or missing

 

Portland, even though it is also called "Portlandia" like the TV Series is also the "Whitest City in the U.S." of large cities

 

Some Democrats Push for Permanent Expansion of Unemployment Benefits

 

2014 Russian military intervention in Ukraine

 

Over 7000 mutations documented in India Now: https://theprint.in/health/covid-x-men-the-7000-mutations-in-india-how-to-understand-them-where-they-came-from/610852/

 

Drove north to Portland from Mt. Shasta

 

Flower children led into Alternative Lifestyles and a Counter culture starting around 1965

 

Pictures of Dharamshala, India from google images at around 6000 feet elevation in the foothills of the Himalayan Mountains which are over 20,000 feet in this location

 

Miracle at Lotus Lake and the Secret Caves of Rewalsar

 

Chuck Lorre Productions #264 and #265

 

What does "Counterculture" mean?

 

Here is a Links Template if you want to use it in HTML View to create your own links pages in HTML: But you have to convert this to HTML View

 

What is a Free Thinker?

 

There are many Legendary places here on earth

 

Many Americans crushed by medical debt as pandemic drags on

 

When I can't give a URL because of the software I put it up here

 

Friday, April 30, 2021

Flower children led into Alternative Lifestyles and a Counter culture starting around 1965

It's difficult to say exactly where all this started but I would have to say it began in Beatnik Culture from the 1950s when it combined with Surfer Culture of California in San Francisco. But, from there it evolved at first through places like San Francisco and UC Berkeley before it moved all over the U.S. and the world eventually. 

So, disparate music groups like The Beach Boys and even Elvis and Jefferson Airplane and others all helped form some of the ideas of the Flower children and the Counter Culture that formed. From this also came The Back to the land movement where people went out into the country and bought beautiful but often inexpensive land and built their own counterculture homes.

begin quote from:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back-to-the-land_movement

Back-to-the-land movements in the U.S.


Back-to-the-land movement

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

A back-to-the-land movement is any of various agrarian movements across different historical periods. The common thread is a call for people to take up smallholding and to grow food from the land with an emphasis on a greater degree of self-sufficiency, autonomy, and local community than found in a prevailing industrial or postindustrial way of life. There have been a variety of motives behind such movements, such as social reform, land reform, and civilian war efforts. Groups involved have included political reformers, counterculture hippies, and religious separatists.

The concept was popularized in the United States at the beginning of the 20th century by activist Bolton Hall, who set up vacant lot farming in New York City and wrote many books on the subject.[1] The practice, however, was strong in Europe even before that time.[2]

During World War II, when Great Britain faced a blockade by Nazi U-boats, a "Dig for Victory" campaign urged civilians to fight food shortages by growing vegetables on any available patch of land. In the USA between the mid-1960s and mid-1970s there was a revived back-to-the-land movement, with substantial numbers migrating from cities to rural areas.

The back-to-the-land movement has ideological links to distributism, a 1920s and 1930s attempt to find a "Third Way" between capitalism and socialism.[3]

The movement throughout history[edit]

The American social commentator and poet Gary Snyder has related that there have been back-to-the-land population movements throughout the centuries, and throughout the world, largely due to the occurrence of severe urban problems and people's felt need to live a better life, often simply to survive.[4]

The historian and philosopher of urbanism Jane Jacobs remarked in an interview with Stewart Brand that with the Fall of Rome city dwellers re-inhabited the rural areas of the region.[5]

From another point of departure, Yi-Fu Tuan takes a view that such trends have often been privileged and motivated by sentiment. "Awareness of the past is an important element in the love of place," he writes, in his 1974 book Topophilia. Tuan writes that an appreciation of nature springs from wealth, privilege, and the antithetical values of cities. He argues that literature about land (and, subsequently, about going back to the land) is largely sentimental; "little," he writes, "is known about the farmer's attitudes to nature..." Tuan finds historical instances of the desire of the civilized to escape civilization in the Hellenistic, Roman, Augustan, and Romantic eras, and, from one of the earliest recorded myths, the Epic of Gilgamesh.

The movement in North America[edit]

Regarding North America, many individuals and households have moved from urban or suburban circumstances to rural ones at different times; for instance, the economic theorist and land-based American experimenter Ralph Borsodi (author of Flight from the City) is said to have influenced thousands of urban-living people to try a modern homesteading life during the Great Depression.[6] The New Deal town of Arthurdale, West Virginia was built in 1933 using the back-to-the-land ideas current at the time.[7]

There was again a fair degree of interest in moving to rural land after World War II. In 1947, Betty MacDonald published what became a popular book, The Egg and I, telling her story of marrying and then moving to a small farm on the Olympic Peninsula in Washington state. This story was the basis of a successful comedy film starring Claudette Colbert and Fred MacMurray.

The Canadian writer Farley Mowat says that many returned veterans after World War II sought a meaningful life far from the ignobility of modern warfare, regarding his own experience as typical of the pattern. In Canada, those who sought a life completely outside of the cities, suburbs, and towns frequently moved into semi-wilderness environs.

But what made the later phenomenon of the 1960s and 1970s especially significant was that the rural-relocation trend was sizable enough that it was identified in the American demographic statistics.

Roots of this movement can perhaps be traced to some of Bradford Angier's books, such as At Home in the Woods (1951) and We Like it Wild (1963), Louise Dickinson Rich's We Took to the Woods (1942) and subsequent books, or perhaps even more compellingly to the 1954 publication of Helen and Scott Nearing's book, Living the Good Life. This book chronicles the Nearings' move to an older house in a rural area of Vermont and their self-sufficient and simple lifestyle. In their initial move, the Nearings were driven by the circumstances of the Great Depression and influenced by earlier writers, particularly Henry David Thoreau. Their book was published six years after A Sand County Almanac, by the ecologist and environmental activist Aldo Leopold, was published, in 1948. Influences aside, the Nearings had planned and worked hard, developing their homestead and life according to a twelve-point plan they had drafted.

The narrative of Phil Cousineau's documentary film Ecological Design: Inventing the Future asserts that in the decades after World War II, "The world was forced to confront the dark shadow of science and industry... There was a clarion call for a return to a life of human scale." By the late 1960s, many people had recognized that, leaving their city or suburban lives, they completely lacked any familiarity with such basics of life as food sources (for instance, what a potato plant looks like, or the act of milking a cow) — and they felt out of touch with nature, in general. While the back-to-the-land movement was not strictly part of the counterculture of the 1960s, the two movements had some overlap in participation.

Many people were attracted to getting more in touch with the basics just mentioned, but the movement could also have been fueled by the negatives of modern life: rampant consumerism, the failings of government and society, including the Vietnam War, and a perceived general urban deterioration, including a growing public concern about air and water pollution. Events such as the Watergate scandal and the 1973 energy crisis contributed to these views. Some people rejected the struggle and boredom of "moving up the company ladder." Paralleling the desire for reconnection with nature was a desire to reconnect with physical work. Farmer and author Gene Logsdon expressed the aim aptly as: "the kind of independence that defines success in terms of how much food, clothing, shelter, and contentment I could produce for myself rather than how much I could buy."[8]

There was also a segment within the movement who already had a familiarity with rural life and farming, who already had skills, and who wanted land of their own on which they could demonstrate that organic farming could be made practical and economically successful.

Besides the Nearings and other authors writing later along similar lines, another influence from the world of American publishing was the unprecedented, vigorous, and intelligent Whole Earth Catalogs. Stewart Brand and a circle of friends and family began the effort in 1968, because Brand believed that there was a groundswell of biologists, designers, engineers, sociologists, organic farmers, and social experimenters who wished to transform civilization along lines that might be called "sustainable". Brand and cohorts created a catalog of "tools" - defined broadly to include useful books, design aids, maps, gardening implements, carpentry and masonry tools, metalworking equipment, and a great deal more.

Another important publication was The Mother Earth News, a periodical (originally on newsprint) that was founded a couple years after the Catalog. Ultimately gaining a large circulation, the magazine was focused on how-to articles, personal stories of successful and budding homesteaders, interviews with key thinkers, and the like. The magazine stated its philosophy was based on returning to people a greater measure of control of their own lives.

Many of the North American back-to-the-landers of the 1960s and 1970s made use of the Mother Earth News, the Whole Earth Catalogs and derivative publications. But as time went on, the movement itself drew more people into it, more or less independently of impetus from the publishing world.

See also[edit]