China in Trouble Long Term? There is a statement that is studied in War Colleges all over the world. "No army can succeed long term against an insurgency supported by the common people in any area of the world." What this actually means is that if the common people in any area support any guerrilla faction no army will be able to ever defeat that insurgency in 1year, 5 years, 10 years or ever.
It is my belief that in both Islamic areas of China and soon in Tibet this will be true. These struggles between the Islamics against the Chinese and the Tibetans against the Chinese cannot be won by China. Though China has almost infinite troops to send it does not have infinite money to fund those troops against multiple insurgencies.
Like the United States and NATO in Afghanistan and Iraq, unless the popular will of all the people in every area supports them they will not be able to hold the gained ground without the support of the common people of an area long term.
Yes. It is true that China COULD kill all Tibetans and all Islamics in China. But then one way or the other the whole world would find out and when it did it would become a complete pariah to the whole world and trade with China would eventually stop completely.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Trump to make announcement with Hegseth on shipbuilding from Mar-a-Lago
- Here's how much ACA premiums would have risen this year without tax subsidies:
- How the global food system is impacting obesity and climate change: Study
- quote from Wikipedia: Mark Carney
- gold has surged 70% since the Start of the Year
- As storms inundated Washington state, federal grants for flood mitigation work sat on hold
- Deputy AG says removing photos from Epstein files has 'nothing to do' with Trump(Sure thing) (ha ha)
- reprint of: My Path to Enlightenment from 2011
- is the storm hitting California a pineapple express?
- What is the main weakness of a Subaru 2017 PZEV engine: The Oil Seals and Gaskets. Why? (Part 2)
No comments:
Post a Comment