Summers: Trade defeat will make world more dangerous
CNBC Video
-
11:01Larry Summers: If there's no TPA...37,900 views
-
21:52Greece will find solution with EU: RDIF CEO
-
33:57After Berkshire deal, is it time to buy IAG?
-
43:11These are the world's 'fastest start-ups'
-
54:37Blame Wall Street losses on Greece: Expert
-
66:07Blue Nile taps into China's love for online shopping
-
73:02If Greece exits EU, euro will strengthen: Pro
-
82:41Anson Chan: 'What choice do the HK people have? None'
-
95:07Anson Chan: HK's electoral reform will be vetoed
-
103:26CSOP: 'ChiNext is the future of China'
He said the United States has already failed to participate in China's Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which other Western economic powers have joined. It has also been unable to deliver support for increased Asian participation in the International Monetary Fund and held back the World Bank from growing, he added.
"If we want to be relied upon, if we want people to be interested in our initiatives, if we want to remain a substantial and trusted presence in Asia, a negotiation that we launched three years ago and that we've driven has to be a negotiation that the United States can carry through on."
Read More GOP hopeful Huckabee: My beliefs won't trip me up
Summers first laid out his argument in a weekend editorial in the Financial Times after the House of Representatives rejected a measure necessary to give Obama authority to "fast track" trade negotiations. That authority would allow the president to move forward on the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a free trade deal among a dozen Pacific Rim nations.
House Democrats were instrumental in defeating the measure, known as
Trade Adjustment Assistance, which provides aid to U.S. workers who lose
their jobs as a result of foreign trade. While Democrats support the
program, they oppose major parts of the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which
faces opposition from labor unions.
Summers said one can
debate the economics of the trade deal, but the importance of the United
States being seen to be able to follow through is unquestionable.
"If the United States is not able to carry through, that will raise
questions about the capacity for presidential leadership both for the
remainder of this presidential term and going forward," he said. "No
other country in the world wants to be in the position of negotiating
first with the president, and then with a Congress whose behavior can't
be predicted."
The fast-track power known as Trade Promotion
Authority, allows the executive branch alone to negotiate the terms of
trade deals. Congress would only be able to vote for or against the
final deal, rather than becoming actively involved in negotiations with
foreign countries.
Summers
said it is legitimate to raise concerns that the Trans-Pacific
Partnership will not boost American workers or protect human rights
overseas, but said refusing to grant Trade Promotion Authority will only
assure a deal will not get done.
Read More Hillary Clinton, in Roosevelt Island speech, pledges to close income gap
Asked why Obama has not been able to get labor groups on board,
Summers said the United States has not done what it needs to do as a
country to help working people get by. Labor is wary of foreign trade
because the right to organize and basic social protections are
diminished, income inequality is on the rise, and job growth has been
held back by lack of infrastructure investment, he said.
"There is every reason for organized labor to be unhappy," Summers
said. "The problem is that this is the wrong hostage for them to take."
Global trade will
increase with or without the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and defeating
the deal is not a strategy that will protect the middle class, he said.
Instead, labor should focus on increasing the minimum wage, expanding
family leave, improving universal health care and making higher
education more affordable, he said.
end quote from:
Yahoo7 News | - |
Summers first laid out his argument in a weekend editorial in the Financial
Times after the House of Representatives rejected a measure necessary
to give Obama authority to "fast track" trade negotiations.
No comments:
Post a Comment