The only practical realistic way to look at it if you have traveled and practically looked at it worldwide is that there would have to be required birth control to help everyone to have enough food, clothing and shelter.
Otherwise, it is only a form of slow suicide for the entire human race.
Lifeboat ethics is a metaphor for resource distribution proposed by the ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1974. Hardin's metaphor describes a lifeboat bearing 50 people, with room for ten more. ... In contrast, the lifeboat metaphor presents individual lifeboats as rich nations and the swimmers as poor nations.
Lifeboat ethics - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifeboat_ethics
Lifeboat ethics - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifeboat_ethics
So, maybe if people study lifeboat ethics then it might become more clear to them where we are really at.
And then there are all the rich people who do travel the world who might think: "These people can't all be fed and so what are we going to do? Have another big War?
But, now there's nuclear weapons so wars than might result in world suicide aren't practical for ANYONE to survive.
So, if you look at Trump the rich of the world seem to have said regarding him: "All we have to do is to end the Paris Accords and everyone starts dying more through Global Warming."
So that appears to be exactly where we are on earth right now.
The rich of the world have decided to let Global Warming kill most of the poor and that is what Trump being President is really all about if you are serious and really think about it.
However, I didn't vote for Trump because I believe he might bring about the end of all life on earth because he appears to be sociopathic just like HItler who also had Narcissistic Personality disorder.
Hitler and Tojo and Stalin and Mao all could have easily ended all life on earth in their day too.
No comments:
Post a Comment