Drones over the White House Fence?

If a drunk man working for the government at 3 am can lose control of a small drone that then makes it over the White House fence, not only the White House is in trouble from little drones but every leader and property owner on earth.

Because now every terrorist bomb maker on earth thinks:"What damage can I do now with a drone?"

This is a problem not only for the White House Staff but also the staff of every property on earth.

But, the real problem is the nature of the way technology is designed today in general. Governments like the intrusiveness of technology because it allows them to check on everyone to make sure no one causes trouble of any kind.

However, as governments watch everyone in every way technology harms governments too in every way more and more.

So, this technology that people think will help them is actually not only destroying everyone's lives in the long run it is also taking away governments ability to control anything at all.

As governments force inventors to be more and more intrusive with their products this products also prevent governments from operating in a normal way at all.

This is inevitable with the way present technologies are designed and built. Not only do all people on earth have no secrets but governments have no secrets either. This is just basic logic when you think about all the ramifications of how technologies are now designed.

No government has any secrets that will remain secret and no humans have any secrets that will remain secret either.

Think about it!

So, it isn't just all people on earth in danger it is all governments on earth in danger too.

And in another article I wrote I mentioned how drones are killing the only leaders some countries have or will have by killing them with hellfire missiles.

This might be good for western democracies who don't want terrorist leaders, but these leaders might have been the only leaders their people would accept in these times. So, this also is a cause of failed nation states.

So, the premise I'm making is we are creating one failed state after another in the middle east and Africa by using drones and Hellfire missiles on terrorist leaders. This might be good for western democratic countries but a long term disaster for those countries with no leaders left at all to lead them.

So, the end result is failed states one after another in the middle east and africa.

A good example of this is Qaddaffi. While he was a leader for years and years he was mocked in various ways by western countries. However, it might be obvious now that in some areas the only leader that can hold things together really might be someone like Qaddaffi or Saddam Hussein who both were tyrants.

Another good example might be Arafat who was a terrorist while young and an effective political leader when he was older until he was poisoned by Nuclear radiation in his food likely by Israel or other Western Countries.

So, what we actually might be looking at over the next 20 years is 10 or 20 failed states throughout the middle east where terrorists strike at Europe, Canada and the U.S. from.

I don't think this is very useful to the western world or to the Middle East either.


However, for some governments in the western world  might prefer a few unorganized terrorists over organized and well funded armies with nuclear weapons and drones facing them. However, this might be the alternative choice.

I don't find either of these choices very useful to the world in general either.

So, I understand how frustrated Western governments are with Middle Eastern Terrorists bringing down airliners and ships one by one since about the 1960s or 1970s so far. And then in 1993 and 2001 trying and then succeeding in bringing down the World Trade Center buildings.

So, what is the solution then?