In 1985 and into 1986 I was in Nepal for about 2 months time and in India for around 2 months time 4 months total with my family then (wife and 3 children ages 10 to 14 then). Because of building homes in the U.S. I have some knowledge of engineering things to be safe enough to work or use. So, when we were to cross suspension bridges we looked first at whether there was rust on the cables holding the bridge up. Then we would notice whether there was a wind blowing and whether the bridge was going side to side in the wind. Third we would see how many people were on the bridge and usually wait until there were very few. So, unless we felt safe enough we would not cross any suspension bridge as we trekked through the Himalayas. It's especially important to be safe while trekking miles from the nearest road because even breaking a toe or ankle can easily be fatal to trekkers in the Himalayas (especially at that time when there were NO helicopters for rescue because no cars or trucks can travel most of these places because of the monsoons washing away any roads they might build in many areas.
begin quote from:
https://www.nepalitimes.com/banner/how-safe-are-nepals-suspension-bridges
How safe are Nepal's suspension bridges?
On 30 October, a pedestrian bridge collapsed in the western Indian state of Gujarat, killing 141 people, most of them women, children and the elderly. Built during the British colonial period, the 137-year-old suspension bridge had reopened just five days earlier following repairs.
Overcrowding and hasty repairs were cited as the reasons for the tragedy, and this has prompted an assessment of Nepal’s own 9,767 pedestrian suspension bridges, used by millions of people every day all over the country. Their maintenance is often an afterthought and in many instances, they are in a dilapidated state after damage from floods and landslides.
There has also been a spurt of bridge-building over scenic Himalayan gorges connecting far-flung communities that have themselves become tourist attractions and selfie-spots. During festival time, there is also dangerous overcrowding of some of these bridges.
The construction and upkeep of Nepal’s infrastructure have never been a priority with inherent corruption and mismanagement of allocated funds being the norm rather than the exception. In fact, it is often easier for authorities to build newer sub-standard structure instead of maintaining old ones.
Read also: Building bridges
“If a suspension bridge is not regularly maintained, it can collapse,” says construction expert Narendra Raj Joshi. “There has also been no study of broken or non-functioning bridges, so repairs have not been carried out properly.”
“There is no chance of accidents like the Gujarat bridge collapse happening in Nepal,” says Pravesh Regmi, Engineer of the Suspension Bridge Department under the Ministry of Urban Development. “The bridges from the 1960s have a lifespan of 50 years.”
Many bridges in Nepal are now nearing their design lifespan, and pose a reason for concern. Besides age, they lack proper maintenance and study. And these become particularly dangerous during festivals and pilgrimages when hundreds of people cross them at the same time.
Pedestrian bridges are vital in connecting many villages in remote and roadless parts of Nepal. In addition to accessibility, bridges help get farm produce to market, transport the sick, and are important for children to attend school. Often times, they are the only way to do so in rural Nepal. They also allow connection to tourist destinations and religious places.
Every year, the Department of Local Infrastructure receives demands for hundreds of bridges, with a total of 594 have been constructed by the local and state governments with technical support from Helvetas Nepal in the past year.
“The bridges are either short or long, either suspension D-type, suspension N-type, or steel truss,” adds Pravesh Regmi. The suspension types are specific to the topography they are constructed in such a way that the D-type is for hills and mountainous terrain while the N-type is for the Tarai..
Experts agree that the government should be in charge of timely maintenance of the bridges. The collapse of a bridge does not just lead to loss of lives, but can isolate an entire area. However, the lack of a proper budget and policy has compromised the safe functioning of suspension bridges in many parts of Nepal.
Before Nepal transitioned into the federal political system, suspension bridges were monitored and maintained by caretakers or the District Development Committee. Now, repairs are carried out only if some nuts are loose or if the steel plates are missing. Local and provincial governments also lack data on bridges, making regular maintenance difficult to conduct.
Read also: Bridge builders think nationally and act locally, Hemlata Rai
While division chief Bharat Aryal admits that some bridges have collapsed, but that was due to natural disasters. "We need to improve our policies regarding where to build bridges, what type, what materials to use," says Narendra Raj Joshi. "Before, bridges were used to mainly cross the rivers. Nowadays, people ride motorcycles on these old bridges. We need to examine previous standards of building bridges and change them as needed."
Further, the safety of a suspension bridge is determined by the geography and time it was built in: “Climate factors such as floods, landslides, earthquakes can also damage the foundation of a bridge,” adds Joshi.
Bharat Aryal concurs: “There should be policies to make local and state governments accountable. Suspension bridge constructions must be systemised and should be reported yearly.”
Translated from the Nepali original in himlkhabar.com by Aria Parasai.
Read more: Bridge builders, Sonia Awale
No comments:
Post a Comment