Intelligence
sources confirm that the CIA has high confidence that the Russians
tried to influence the presidential election and that they favored
Donald Trump, CBS News’ Jeff Pegues reports.
Sources say elements
of the Republican National Committee (RNC) apparatus were hacked, but
the damage was not as widespread as the cyber
hacks that affected the Democratic National Committee (DNC).
There is disagreement between the FBI and CIA over the evidence in the
case, however. Furthermore, some intelligence officials are puzzled
about leaks from the FBI casting doubts on the intelligence community’s
assessment, given that typically, the intelligence community and the FBI
try to come to a consensus before going public with big investigations
like this.
President-elect Trump disputed the
intelligence agencies’ conclusion that Russia intervened in the
election to help his candidacy. “I think it’s ridiculous. I think it’s
just another excuse. I don’t believe it,” he told Fox News’ Chris
Wallace on “Fox News Sunday.”
And his transition team also
dismissed early reports of the intelligence community’s conclusion about Russia’s influence in the election.
“These
are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass
destruction,” the transition team said in a statement. “The election
ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories
in history. It’s now time to move on.”
But the CIA’s “high-confidence judgment” that Russian hacking favored Mr. Trump
caught the attention of former acting CIA Director Michael Morell.
“[T]he
C.I.A. doesn’t come to a high-confidence judgment just based on
circumstantial evidence.” So I think they’ve got more here,” Morell said
in an interview Monday on “CBS This Morning.” “I think they’ve got
sources who are actually telling them what the intent was.”
Sens.
John McCain, R-Arizona, and Chuck Schumer, D-New York, are calling for a
congressional probe of the extent of Russian influence in the
presidential election. While McCain says “it’s clear the Russians
interfered,” the magnitude of their meddling remains to be seen.
“Whether
they intended to interfere to the degree that they were trying to elect
a certain candidate, I think that’s a subject of investigation,” he
told CBS News’ “Face the Nation” Sunday. “But facts are stubborn things.
They did hack into this campaign.”
Sen. Mitch McConnell said Monday that he supports the call for a Senate investigation
into possible Russian interference in the election. “[A]ny foreign
breach of our cybersecurity measures is disturbing and I strongly
condemn any such efforts,“ McConnell told reporters. “I agree with
Senator [Chuck] Schumer, Senator [John] McCain, Burr and others that
this simply cannot be a partisan issue,”
Morell, in considering
the president-elect’s dismissal of the CIA’s judgment, hypothesized that
he is looking at the CIA through the wrong lens.
“[W]hat I
think’s going on here is that he believes that this is a political
judgment. He believes that the C.I.A. is a political institution and
he’s gonna have to learn that it’s not. It is apolitical,” Morell told
“CBS This Morning.” “It is there to tell him, ‘call ‘em like you see
‘em.’ It is the most important institution to him in that regard. It’s
gonna tell him-- how to think about the world in a way that is divorced
of politics and divorced of policy. And he’s gonna have to start
understanding that.”
No comments:
Post a Comment