House oversight
investigating WH
handling of Rob
Porter
investigating WH
handling of Rob
Porter
CNN.com
40 mins ago
Authorities respond
to shooting at NSA
facility
to shooting at NSA
facility
CNN.com
45 mins ago
begin quote from:
Michael Cohen's
story on his Stormy
Daniels' payout
doesn't pass the smell test
story on his Stormy
Daniels' payout
doesn't pass the smell test
CNN.com
1 hour ago
Michael Cohen's story on his Stormy Daniels' payout doesn't pass the smell test
Washington (CNN)Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's personal lawyer, says he made a $130,000 payment from his own pocket to porn star Stormy Daniels
in the run-up to the 2016 election -- a pre-emptive measure to protect
the presidential candidate from accusations that she and Trump had a
physical relationship.
To
make this six-figure payment, Cohen set up an LLC in Delaware, a state
famous for its lack of corporate transparency. He says he neither told
Trump nor anyone else in the Trump Organization he was making the
payment. And he was not paid back in any way, shape or form.
"Just
because something isn't true doesn't mean that it can't cause you harm
or damage," Cohen said in a statement issued Tuesday night. "I will
always protect Mr. Trump."
That's the story Cohen told The New York Times' Maggie Haberman on Tuesday night. By any standard of logic, it's a very, very hard one to swallow.
Don't
overthink it. Cohen -- out of the goodness of his heart!!!! -- dropped a
six-figure payment to a porn star even though he didn't believe her
allegations that she and the President had an affair after the birth of
his son Barron? I mean, come on.
People
don't do that. I don't care how rich Cohen is. Why would he spent
$130,000 to make Daniels go away -- and not tell her story -- if her
story was fundamentally without merit?
Remember
that the 2016 campaign saw more than a dozen women come forward with
allegations, which Trump has denied, that Trump had either sexually
assaulted them or acted inappropriately toward them over his decades in
public life. Why would Cohen feel compelled to cut a massive check to a
porn star -- from his own coffers -- who was making false allegations of an affair?
Right. I thought so.
Trump
was not someone who presented a squeaky clean image to the public. He
has been married three times and created a character -- "John Miller" -- to brag about the sexual prowess of "Mr. Trump" to the New York City tabloids in the 1980s.
Why
was Cohen so concerned about this allegedly false allegation that he
felt compelled to dump a ton of his own money into keeping it away from
the media? And take such care to try to keep it from ever being known?
What made this situation any different than all of the other false
allegations made by women against Trump.
Right. I thought so.
Think
of it in another context. Let's say Barack Obama's personal lawyer made
the exact same payout to a woman alleging an affair in the lead-up to
the 2008 election. And his response was the same: This allegation is
false and/but the President never knew about my decision to spend my own
money on ensuring that it didn't come out in the course of the
campaign.
Would that explanation make sense to you? Would it quiet any follow-up questions you might have?
OF COURSE IT WOULDN'T.
Sometimes you have to rely on your gut. Your BS detector. And none of Cohen's story passes that smell test. Not even close.
No comments:
Post a Comment