Washington Post | - |
THREE YEARS after U.S. and NATO forces helped liberate Libya from the dictatorship of Moammar Gaddafi, the country is beginning to look a lot like another nation where an abrupt U.S.
THREE
YEARS after U.S. and NATO forces helped liberate Libya from the
dictatorship of Moammar Gaddafi, the country is beginning to look a lot
like another nation where an abrupt U.S. disengagement following a civil
war led to chaos: Afghanistan in the 1990s. In Libya, heavily armed
militias are battling for control of Tripoli and Benghazi as well as the
international airport. The United States, France and other Western
governments involved in the 2011 military intervention have evacuated their diplomats and abandoned their embassies. A U.N. mission that was supposed to help broker political accords also left.
Last
month in Benghazi, the Ansar al-Sharia militia, which has ties to
al-Qaeda and was involved in the Sept. 11, 2012, assault that killed the
U.S. ambassador there, stormed a military base and then declared the
city the seat of an “Islamic emirate.” That’s what the Taliban called Afghanistan. According to The Post’s Karen DeYoung, some U.S. counterterrorism officials believe Libya’s Islamists
could seek to align themselves with the Islamic State, the al-Qaeda
offshoot that controls western Iraq and eastern Syria. Whether or not
that happens, it’s not hard to foresee eastern Libya becoming a
launching pad for terrorist attacks against nearby Europe or even the
U.S. homeland.U.S. and Western responsibility for this mess is heavy. Having tipped the outcome of the war against the Gaddafi regime, NATO quickly exited Libya, which was left with no army or political institutions but was awash in weapons. Repeated Libyan requests for assistance in restoring security were brushed off; a small-scale NATO training program based outside the country was little more than symbolic. As in the case of Afghanistan, Congress rejected the Obama administration’s aid requests.
Libya’s attempt to establish a working democracy, meanwhile, was overtaken by infighting among militias, which slowly polarized along an Islamist-secular divide. Libyans appear to prefer secular government: Islamists fared poorly in a parliamentary election held in June. But their military forces, which include a militia from the coastal city of Misurata as well as Ansar al-Sharia, are formidable.
The Obama administration has done its best to ignore Libya’s collapse, even as Republicans in Congress obsess over conspiracy theories about the 2012 Benghazi attack. Administration officials continue to peddle the empty line that “Libya’s challenges can really only be solved by the Libyans themselves,” as Secretary of State John F. Kerry put it this week. Officials point to the newly elected parliament, which convened in the eastern city of Tobruk last weekend, as a possible vehicle for a political settlement.
That’s hardly likely. Pacification of Libya would probably require another Western intervention and a peacekeeping force, coupled with a far more robust international mediation mission. The chances that such an intervention will be mounted, of course, are minuscule; the Obama administration would almost certainly not endorse it.
Of course, the notion that the United States should intervene against the budding al-Qaeda menace in Afghanistan during the 1990s also was dismissed as fanciful. After the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, recriminations were plentiful. Yet the lessons of Afghanistan seem to have been lost in U.S. policy toward the contemporary Middle East.
Read more on this topic:
The Post’s View: Pulling Libya back from the brink of civil war
The Post’s View: What Obama botched in Libya
David Ignatius: U.S. inattention to Libya breeds chaos
Frederic M. Wehrey: Libya needs help from U.S. to ease discontent
No comments:
Post a Comment