I don't think number 6 in Obamacae 2.0 is correct

6) This bill is going to unleash the kind of political fury on Republicans that will elect Elizabeth Warren in 2020. Part of what killed Hillary Clinton’s campaign was voters getting their massive Obamacare premium increases in the mail in October. Republicans seem eager to inflict that kind of fatal damage on themselves. The explosive reaction to Obamacare launched the Tea Party in 2010 and swept Republicans into Congress during the mid-term elections of 2014. The Left is furious and energetic under Trump. The 2018 midterm elections are right around the corner, and Democrats are going to launch a holy war against Trump during the 2020 election. The Left will rally around Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other progressives and portray the Democrats as the party of the forgotten man. The white, working class gave Trump a chance in 2016. They could easily begin voting Democratic again or drop out of the political process altogether after a healthcare betrayal.
end partial quote from:
Obamacare 2.0."

Because of precedent. There has never been a woman president. Overcoming this precedent in scary times like this would be very difficult.

If we had looked at history more when Trump was elected we would have seen that 8 years is the Maximum one party has in the White House without the other party in power for 4 to 8 years.

Think about this:

FDR 1932 until he died April 12th 1945.
Then his vice president Truman until January 1953
when Eisenhower took office until January 1961
when Kennedy was inaugurated until his death in 1963
when Johnson his vice president took over and stayed in
until January 1969 when Nixon was inaugurated.

It goes on like this but notice after 8 years was the maximum any president could serve because of FDR only Bush I served another 4 years after Reagan.

This is the only exception to ONLY 4 to 8 years of one party or the other in succession since Eisenhower.

So, the fact that a Republican (Historically speaking) was voted in in 2016 should not surprise anyone!

So, from a historical perspective whether Hillary was a man or a woman had no relevance at all!

Only the historical truths were what was important!