either:
1. The extinction of all life presently on earth.
or
2. the extinction of most life presently on earth.
Then what happens after that?
From my point of view earth is balancing herself in the ways she has always.
So, it's all about balance.
Life isn't any one thing.
Life is constantly changing.
So, all humans and animals and fish and birds presently on earth might die this century or in the next
few centuries.
Why?
Because humans have upset the natural balances of the ecosystems of earth. And anyone who does that likely will die.
Unless they decide to terraform earth into something else or find a way to maintain earth the way it is somehow.
For example, I already understand how we could reduce temperatures very easily.
You take pyroclastic glass powder from Icelandic and other volcanoes and you have passenger planes spread it at around 30,000 feet worldwide.
This can be done.
You might say then "Why aren't we doing this?"
Because you have to have agreements to do this. And the problem becomes those agreements presently don't exist.
And there are other problems. When you reduce the temperatures on earth with pyroclastic dust from volcanoes things might happen like the French revolution in the late 1700s when the guillotine was invented and they axed all the aristocracy of France that didn't run away to England or to another country. The French poor were starving from the pyroclastic Glass from Icelandic volcanoes preventing enough sun for food to grow properly in France. So, since the upper class Aristocracy ALWAYS was fed first the poor starved and eventually revolted and axed Marie Antoinette and her husband the King of France.
So, yes, there are solutions to global warming we just don't have agreements because some people are bound to die from those changes. When you create less sun hitting the earth temperatures drop year around and this changes weather patterns. When I lived in Mt. Shasta when the Mt. Saint Helens blew up in the early 1980s the temperatures dropped year around about 10 degrees Fahrenheit from all the volcanic dust high in the air circling the U.S. and world for one or more years. Sunsets were purple and green and orange and sometimes red. The orange and red is normal without volcanic dust high in the air moving on the winds and currents.
But, you also can keep more people alive by doing this and less people are going to die in Hurricanes because winds will reduce from the pyroclastic glass dust in the air preventing the sun from hitting the earth so much. And with less sun hitting the earth and the oceans there will be less updrafts creating high winds on land and sea. However, there also will be less rain because lower temperatures usually produce less rain to. And Temperature and winds decide when rain clouds form and where they go worldwide.
But, there has to be a will to do this (an agreement worldwide to do this) and that doesn't exist and may never.
And because of this directly 1 billion or more people are likely to die from Global Warming between now and the end of this century.
Will they be counted?
No. probably not because governments wouldn't want the average person to know any of this because it is a very very inconvenient truth about life on earth.
There is another factor I just realized which is that jet engines and pyroclastic dust don't work well together. So, likely you might have to send up the dust with weather balloons and release the pyroclastic Glass dust at much much higher altitudes so it can spread out further before any of it reaches 40,000 feet and under where most passenger jets fly.
But, if you are actually serious about reducing global warming this could be done. However, without agreements if a nation did it it might be considered an act of war by another nation that might be harmed by the stuff drifting in too high a density over their nation and interfering with normal crop growth.
But, this is one of many many potential solutions to global warming.
But, I'm thinking the rich are just going to let the poor and unlucky of the world die from global warming for a long time. Sort of like what Trump and other rich people are doing right now.
They likely just see it as a form of birth control and natural selection combined.
So, unless you protect yourself from Global warming likely no one else will either worldwide. At least for now.
But, when you see someone driving a Prius or a Tesla, remember they are helping keep you and me alive from Global Warming too (while at the same time reducing the price of Gas and Diesel worldwide by not burning ANY gas at all).
As I thought more about this the most significant changes caused by Global Warming are in the Artic, the Antarctic and in the Equator regions. In the more temperate zones like the U.S. is mostly in the changes aren't as extreme as people dying a lot from too high temperatures every April to August in places like India and Pakistan for example. When you have extreme temperatures with extreme humidity people are going to die without air conditioning or a cold hole in the ground to crawl into that they dig themselves usually or by going into a subterranean cave.
So, since the most extreme changes to temperatures are in the Arctic and Antarctic maybe pyroclastic Glass would best be started here where there are generally less people to begin with. And 2nd maybe the next place would be over India and Pakistan where people are dying from April to August so much now from extreme humidity combined with temperatures of 115 degrees Fahrenheit and much higher. I read one news story of how 60,000 people had to be hospitalized with heat prostration in one area this last summer from too much heat and humidity combined. Even if you survive something like this often your health and sensibilities are not the same after that which could either be health related, PTSD related from the Trauma to your body and mind or it also could induce psychological problems from the PTSD from the trauma of the event.
As a child in the 1950s often we just did without air conditioning in cars and trucks in 115 degrees or more outside. We turned the windwings toward us and wet wash clothes and my face and lips would get chapped trying to stay functional and not go into sort of a "Sleep coma" where you had a headache for 3 or more days.
I experience this type of thing a lot in the 1950s as a child before Air conditioning in Cars became more normal like now. This was a common wind wing on most American cars in the 1950s and before. Since you didn't have air conditioning all you had was to turn the wind wing towards yourself and drive fast and maybe squirt water on your face so you didn't pass out driving. Often children were left in the back seat of the car and we often passed out in the heat and became incoherent and has headaches for 3 days or more if we survived it. This was just being a child in the 1950s in the Western U.S. At least where I lived the air was dry so more people and children survived this sort of thing.
The stopped making wind wings on cars for two basic reasons.
1. air conditioning became more normal in cars and actually began to work well in most cars.
2. During car accidents parts of people would get caught on wind wings and pulled off if the wind wings were fully open to relieve the passenger or driver in front of the heat while driving.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Because of fighting in Ukraine and Israel Bombing Iran I thought I should share this EMP I wrote in 2011
- The 60s: Wikipedia
- The 70s: Wikipedia
- most read articles from KYIV Post
- The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article
- reprint of: Drones very small to large
- Keri Russell pulls back the curtain on "The Diplomat" (season 2 filming now for Netflix)
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- Jack Ryan from Prime (4 seasons)
- When I began to write "A Journey through Time"
No comments:
Post a Comment