begin quote from:
https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/02/opinions/jill-biden-prophesy-trump-vs-biden-verdict-column-galant/index.html
Opinion: Jill Biden’s prophecy
Editor’s Note: Sign up to get this weekly column as a newsletter. We’re looking back at the strongest, smartest opinion takes of the week from CNN and other outlets.
Trying to achieve moral virtue is not easy, the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle taught. If you have to pick between two extremes, choose “the lesser of two evils,” because that’s likelier to bring you to the desired middle way.
That’s the approach President Joe Biden implies when he often quotes his father: “Don’t compare me to the Almighty. Compare me to the alternative.”
Yet, when first lady Jill Biden appeared on “The View” Wednesday, the choice was painted in much starker terms: “I believe Americans are going to choose good over evil.”
She predicted that the polls showing her husband trailing former President Donald Trump “are going to turn … as time goes on as, as people start to focus a little bit more about what’s at stake and start to become educated on the issues and the differences between them…”
A day later, Jill and Joe Biden got the biggest piece of evidence they can cite in hopes of moving the polls in his favor: A Manhattan jury returned a swift verdict of guilty against Trump on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.
Yet the former president didn’t miss a beat in his relentless effort to brand the trial and his conviction as “rigged,” falsely arguing that the outcome was orchestrated by the Biden campaign and using it to ramp up his fundraising.
And Republicans, particularly those seeking to become Trump’s vice president pick, flocked to condemn the verdict. “Republicans have been lining up more quickly than kids at an ice cream truck to discredit the judicial process and declare their support for Trump,” Julian Zelizer noted.
Trump’s trial is over but America’s is still in its early stages. The voters are being tested by the politics of bitter division and will be asked to choose sides this fall between two deeply unpopular major party candidates.
“We’ve never had a trial of a president before,” observed legal analyst Norm Eisen, who penned a daily diary from the courtroom for CNN Opinion. “And yet, the trial was about one of the oldest American ideals: that no one is above the law. We overthrew a British king and put a constitution in his place. And with all of our ups and down as a nation, we have ever kept that idea alive. Having a president subject to the same laws, rules and procedures as any other American is a powerful reaffirmation of that idea.”
As president, Trump was acquitted in two impeachment trials in the US Senate, and he has so far fended off trials in three other criminal cases. But in New York Thursday, “the enormity of Trump being finally held accountable by a jury of his peers after so many allegations resonates across the nation and around the world,” Eisen observed.
“The ranks of the anti-Trump #Resistance haven’t celebrated this hard since November 7, 2020,” Patrick T. Brown pointed out. “Whatever the polls have said up until Thursday about the odds this November, progressives might tell themselves, being found guilty of all 34 charges of falsifying business records could be the silver bullet that prevents a second Trump term.”
“But let’s think about that logic: Trump’s personal eccentricities and baggage have been well-known for years. The act for which hush money was proffered — allegedly cheating on his postpartum wife with an adult film actress — has been known since 2018. Are there really that many voters whose view of Trump as a man, or politician, could be altered by bookkeeping irregularities? How many would-be Trump voters will be swayed against him because of miscategorized business expenses?”
And SE Cupp wrote, “Will his voters care now that they’re about to elect a convicted felon? Probably not. But how this will impact swing and undecided voters is the looming question — they might not be so forgiving.”
No comments:
Post a Comment