Thursday, April 12, 2018

Is Stormy Daniels Daughter Trump's child?

During her 60 minutes interview she says something about being pregnant during this affair with Trump.

However, that just isn't logical at all. What woman would have unprotected sex with a man that she just met when she was pregnant? I don't believe it.

Therefore, Logically the daughter Stormy had was Trump's from this affair. I also watched her female friend cry when she saw the 60 minutes segment when she put it all together also. So, what this means to me is that Stormy Daniels Child is Trump's because of the tears after hearing more information than she was originally privy to.

The following is another story about another of Trump's "Love Children".



begin quote from:

Ex-Trump Doorman Was Paid to Keep Quiet About Love-Child ...

people.com/politics/trump-doorman-paid-love-child-rumors-reports/
6 hours ago - Two new reports claim that a former Trump building doorman was paid $30,000 for a story relaying rumors that President Donald Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock with an employee in the late '80s. On Thursday, both The New Yorker and the Associated Press published reports claiming that ...

×
YOU MIGHT LIKE
STORMY DANIELS SAYS SHE FELT THREATENED TO KEEP QUIET ABOUT ALLEGED TRUMP AFFAIR: 'I WAS RATTLED'
DAVE QUINN 
April 12, 2018 05:40 PM
Two new reports claim that a former Trump building doorman was paid $30,000 for a story relaying rumors that President Donald Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock with an employee in the late ’80s.
On Thursday, both The New Yorker and the Associated Press published reports claiming that National Enquirer publisher American Media Inc. (AMI) paid Dino Sajudin, the former Trump doorman, $30,000 to own the exclusive rights to Sajudin’s story, with a $1 million penalty if he told anyone else about it or the contract. The reports go on to say that AMI killed the story after deciding the rumors were not true.
This was in November 2015, five months after Trump launched his presidential campaign, The New Yorker reported.
The New Yorker and the AP have not been able to verify Sajudin’s claims. The unidentified women Sajudin named to The New Yorker as Trump’s alleged mistress told the AP last August that she never had an affair with the president. The New Yorker recently spoke with her husband, who called Sajudin’s allegations “completely false and ridiculous.”
Sajudin confirmed in a tweet this afternoon that “while working at Trump World Tower I was instructed not to criticize President Trump’s former housekeeper due to a prior relationship she had with President Trump which produced a child.”
The White House did not immediately respond to PEOPLE’s request for comment, but denied to The New Yorker both the love child allegations and Sajudin’s claim that Trump’s head of security, Matthew Calamari, told Sajudin the rumors. The magazine quoted a source close to the White House as saying that Trump “did not have an affair. This is a totally false accusation.” Several AMI sources also told The New Yorker that they doubted the truth of the rumor.
PEOPLE was not able to reach Sajudin.
Sajudin’s story was potentially a big one. He told AMI he’d heard a rumor from Calamari that Trump had secretly fathered a child with an employee at Trump World Tower in New York City, the Associated Press reported.
Sajudin also gave AMI the names of the alleged mistress and child and passed a lie-detector test during which he stated that Calamari had told him the rumor, The New Yorker reported.
SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty
But AMI — headed by its C.E.O. and chairman David Pecker, who describes the president as “a personal friend” — did not run the story, allegedly because it could not confirm it to be true. An AMI publication, Radar Online, today quoted an AMI spokesperson as saying that after declining to run Saudin’s story, AMI released him from his exclusivity clause and freed him “to tell his story to whomever he wanted.”
According to a previous report from The Wall Street Journal published days before the November 2016 election, AMI allegedly used an elaborate coverup system to help Trump hide his alleged extramarital affair with former Playboy Playmate of the Year Karen McDougal. AMI told The New Yorker they never ran McDougal’s story because they “did not find it credible.”
Trump’s longtime personal lawyer Michael D. Cohen — who previously admitted to making a $130,000 payment out of his own pocket to adult film star Stormy Daniels, which she said was used to silence her own claims of an affair with Trump  — was also in personal contact “with AMI executives while the company’s reporters were looking into Sajudin’s story,” according to two former AMI employees who spoke with The New Yorker. The White House has denied the McDougal and Daniels affairs ever happened.
Ron Sachs - Pool/Getty
Like they previously said of McDougal, who was allegedly paid $150,000 for the rights to her story, AMI claims they never ran Sajudin’s story because they did not have sufficient evidence.
In a piece published on AMI’s site Radar Online hours before The New Yorker and AP published their stories, a former AMI employee said the media company spent four weeks looking into Sajudin’s claims and decided they weren’t true. Citing legal documents, Radar reported that Sajudin was released from his contract after the 2016 election.
RELATED VIDEO: PEOPLE Writer Natasha Stoynoff Breaks Silence, Accuses Donald Trump of Sexual Attack
YOU MIGHT LIKE
TRUMP SEXUAL ASSAULT ACCUSERS FIND UNLIKELY HEROINE IN STORMY DANIELS: 'SHE'S GOT A LOT OF GUTS'
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP, MELANIA AND TIFFANY ARRIVE FOR EASTER MASS
AMI categorically denies that Donald Trump or Michael Cohen had anything to do with its decision not to pursue a story about a ‘love child’ that it determined was not credible,” a spokesperson for the company told CNN on Thursday. “The suggestion that David Pecker has ever used company funds to ‘shut down’ this or any investigation is not true. In addition, AMI and Mr. Pecker emphatically deny any suggestion that there might have been be any ‘partnership’ created which might influence any business ties in regard to AMI. These claims are reckless, unsubstantiated, and false.”

No comments: