Wednesday, March 15, 2017

Is there a relationship between Sanskrit and Chinese languages?

I asked this question to a search engine and these are the buttons I received in

answer to this question so if you have the same question maybe this will help?


Is there a relation between chinese and sanskrit language? - Quora

https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-relation-between-chinese-and-sanskrit-language
Nov 21, 2015 - Long answer: chinese is a branch of a language family that consists of many languagessuch as Mandarin, Cantonese, Hokkien, Shanghainese, etc. Sanskrit is just a single language. Bothlanguages are very influential.

Language Log » Are Sanskrit and Chinese "congenial languages"?

languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=6931
Sep 9, 2013 - A Buddhologist who knows Sanskrit, Tibetan, Chinese, Japanese, and ... non-cognatelanguages, since the very organic overlap between the ...

List of loanwords in Chinese - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_loanwords_in_Chinese
Loanwords have entered written and spoken Chinese from many sources, including ancient ... Throughout China, Buddhism has also introduced words from Sanskrit and Pali. ... Although politically-minded language reform under the Republic and People's Republic of China have generally preferred to use calques and ...

Sanskrit - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit
Sanskrit is the primary liturgical language of Hinduism, a philosophical language of Hinduism, .... In Mainland China, musicians such as Sa Dingding have written pop songs in Sanskrit. ... Evidence for such a theory includes the close relationship between the Indo-Iranian tongues and the Baltic and Slaviclanguages, ...


Sanskrit and Tamil Words in Ancient Chinese! | Tamil and Vedas

https://tamilandvedas.com/.../sanskrit-and-tamil-words-in-ancient-c...
Translate this page
May 21, 2015 - Sanskrit and Tamil Words in Ancient Chinese! ... Nadar community in Tamil Nadu believes they have connections with China in the past. 3. ... There are common words between any twolanguages in the world because human ...

No comments: