Thursday, May 4, 2017

Updated Republican senator says House may pass health bill, but the legislation has 0% chance in Senate

The reason it has zero chance in the Senate is House Republicans are not reading the actual bill just voting along party lines. However, in the Senate they ARE reading the bill. For example, just in NEW YORK CITY if this bill passed 1 million of 8 million people in New York City lose all Healthcare at all if this bill passes. This is how bad this bill actually is!
begin quote from:
Updated Republican senator says House may pass health bill, but the legislation has 0% chance in Senate 
  • Dow
    20,946 -11.55 -0.06%
  • Nasdaq
    6,074 +1.29 +0.02%
  • S&P 500
    2,390 +2.01 +0.08%
10:30 A.M. ET 10:30 A.M. ET 10:21 A.M. ET 10:17 A.M. ET 10:15 A.M. ET 10:14 A.M. ET 10:12 A.M. ET 10:12 A.M. ET 10:06 A.M. ET 10:04 A.M. ET 10:04 A.M. ET 10:04 A.M. ET 10:03 A.M. ET 10:03 A.M. ET 10:01 A.M. ET 10:01 A.M. ET 10:01 A.M. ET 9:59 A.M. ET 9:59 A.M. ET

Republican senator says House may pass health bill, but the legislation has 0% chance in Senate

Published: May 4, 2017 10:21 a.m. ET
The Tennessee Republican was a guest on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” just as House Republicans were readying a vote on what the American Health Care Act before its prospective effects had been analyzed by the Congressional Budget Office.
Ironic perhaps, that, given that House Republicans had tweet-taunted then–Speaker Nancy Pelosi on just that score back in 2010:
Corker said his office had turned off the volume on the debate over health-insurance legislation “after the last failure,” in March.
Republican strategist Steve Schmidt, also appearing on MSNBC, said Republicans, particularly in the House, were faced two bad choices but that not undoing so-called Obamacare with their party in control of the White House and both chambers of Congress “would go down as one of the biggest broken promises in American political history.”
Personal finance: Obamacare helped make a 50% dent in personal bankruptcies
Plus: Republican health bill could affect those with employer insurance, too

No comments: