Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Potential problem with Digital Singularity

If you know about the Golden Mean(see note after article) used by the master artists of the past and present and have ever noticed that the distances between the planets follows  the

Fibonacci number

0,\;1,\;1,\;2,\;3,\;5,\;8,\;13,\;21,\;34,\;55,\;89,\;144,\; \ldots\; 

At one point I noticed that the ratio of even the distances between the planets approximated the Fibonacci series of numbers in other words the distance (ratio wise) between the sun and Mercury represents 1, the distance between Mercury and Venus is 2, the distance between Venus and Earth is 3, the distance between Earth and Mars is 5 etc. etc. etc.

Also the ratios of people's fingers to elbows to arms to legs as well as the ratios of the limbs of trees and the ratios of everything living on earth tends to follow the fibanacci ratios.

However, then we come to digital computers which are not necessarily designed using these mathematics. And because of this it is possible that they will create a singularity incompatible with the rest of life in the Solar System which is all based upon the ratios of the fibonacci series of numbers.

My premise is this: If the digital microprocessor was reverse engineered from something like the Roswell Ship as U.S Army Colonel Corso in his book "The Day After Roswell" said then possibly this ship (that crash landed in Roswell) came from either another solar system or even another dimension. It is possible that the sentient life that will eventually result from Artificial intelligence with the non-living mathematics using binary and digital forms might be in conflict at some point with the rest of life in the solar system since its origination was not from within the solar system or possibly not even from within a dimension we are familiar with at all.

Note: The following describes more about the Golden Mean or Golden Ratio:

Golden ratio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The golden section is a line segment divided according to the golden ratio: The total length a + b is to the length of the longer segment a as the length of a is to the length of the shorter segment b.
In mathematics and the arts, two quantities are in the golden ratio if the ratio of the sum of the quantities to the larger quantity is equal to the ratio of the larger quantity to the smaller one. The golden ratio is an irrational mathematical constant, approximately 1.6180339887.[1] Other names frequently used for the golden ratio are the golden section (Latin: sectio aurea) and golden mean.[2][3][4] Other terms encountered include extreme and mean ratio,[5] medial section, divine proportion, divine section (Latin: sectio divina), golden proportion, golden cut,[6] golden number, and mean of Phidias.[7][8][9] In this article the golden ratio is denoted by the Greek lowercase letter phi ( \varphi \,) , while its reciprocal, 1/\varphi \, or \varphi^{-1} \,, is denoted by the uppercase variant Phi (\Phi \,).
The figure on the right illustrates the geometric relationship that defines this constant. Expressed algebraically: end quote. The figure that was on the right is now below seen as the illustrated rectangle. begin quote again.
 \frac{a+b}{a} = \frac{a}{b} \equiv \varphi\,.
This equation has one positive solution in the set of algebraic irrational numbers:
\varphi = \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\approx 1.61803\,39887\ldots\, [1]
 

Construction of a golden rectangle:
1. Construct a unit square (red).
2. Draw a line from the midpoint of one side to an opposite corner.
3. Use that line as the radius to draw an arc that defines the long dimension of the rectangle.
At least since the Renaissance, many artists and architects have proportioned their works to approximate the golden ratio—especially in the form of the golden rectangle, in which the ratio of the longer side to the shorter is the golden ratio—believing this proportion to be aesthetically pleasing. Mathematicians have studied the golden ratio because of its unique and interesting properties. end quote from wikipedia heading "Golden Ratio"

Note: Years ago the table of distances came out perfectly. But it doesn't work out as well with this particular table of distances for some reason.
 
Planet
Mean Distance From Sun (millions of miles)
Mean Distance in AU
Mean Diameter (miles)
Mercury
36.0
0.39
3,031
Venus
67.1
0.72
7,521
Earth
92.9
1.00
7,926
Mars
141.5
1.52
4,221
Jupiter
483.4
5.20
88,734
Saturn
886.7
9.54
74,566
Uranus
1,782.7
19.14
31,566
Neptune
2,794.3
30.06
30,199
Pluto
3,666.1
39.53
1,450
 http://idahoptv.org/ntti/nttilessons/lessons2000/lau4.html

No comments: