In
court papers filed Monday, federal government lawyers asked
Riverside-based U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to postpone Tuesday's
hearing because federal investigators believe they may have found a way
to hack the iPhone's security without forcing Apple to help. Federal
prosecutors indicated they would report back to the judge by early
April.
An unidentified "outside party" provided the FBI with a possible
alternative to unlock the iPhone of Syed Farook, one of the shooters in
the December terror attack that left 14 people dead, according to court
papers. The assistance was offered on Sunday, court papers show, and the
FBI now needs time to determine if it will solve the roadblock in the
terror probe.
The development could defuse the clash between Apple and the FBI
over whether the company can be forced to create a software program that
would hack the security of its devices. "If the method is viable, it
should eliminate the need for the assistance from Apple," federal
prosecutors wrote.
Apple has warned that such an order would jeopardize the privacy
rights of tens of millions of customers, prompting a national debate
over the balancing act between the needs of law enforcement to solve
crimes and hunt down terror suspects and the privacy rights of a public
reliant on smartphones in every day life.
There was no immediate reaction from Apple or the judge on the government's request.
Pym triggered the showdown between Apple and the FBI in February,
when she tentatively ordered Apple to unlock Farook's iPhone. However,
she invited legal argument on the unprecedented question, and Apple and
the tech industry have responded with a fierce counterattack to the
FBI's demand.
Earlier Monday, Apple CEO Tim Cook resumed his defense of Apple's
position, saying it is critical to limit the goverment's ability to
interfere with the increasing privacy protections being installed in
devices such as smartphones.
The judge was set to consider hours of legal argument on Tuesday,
when suburban courthouse was expected to be inundated with hundreds of
media members, public officials, privacy advocates and representatives
of the victims' families in the San Bernardino attacks.Law
enforcement officials and the families have backed the FBI's position,
arguing that the demand of Apple is an isolated request and does not
pose a broader threat to privacy protections. Politicians have also
backed the government, expressing concern about Apple interfering with a
crucial terror investigation.
Even if the San Bernardino case
moves forward without resolution of the issue, it will not go away. A
similar case has been unfolding in New York, where a federal judge
recently sided with Apple and refused the FBI's request to force the
company to unlock an iPhone in a drug case. Apple disclosed in that case
that it has faced at least a dozen such requests to unlock iPhones
around the country.
However, Apple and many digital rights groups
have argued that Congress, not the courts, should address the issue,
which has sparked a national debate.
Howard Mintz covers legal affairs. Contact him at 408-286-0236, or follow him at
Twitter.com/hmintz.
No comments:
Post a Comment