Why Russia might not stop with Crimea

Foreign affairs    March 3

Why Russia might not stop with Crimea

It's anyone's guess how Russia will act in Ukraine over the coming days and weeks. The New Yorker's David Reminick, who spent years reporting out of Russia, and who recently wrote a fascinating analysis of Putin's worldview, argues that the situation could get much worse before it gets better. To justify the invasion of Crimea, the Russian parliament "repeatedly echoed the need to protect ethnic Russians in Ukraine — a theme consonant with the Kremlin's rhetoric about Russians everywhere, including the Baltic States," he writes. "But there was, of course, not one word about the sovereignty of Ukraine, which has been independent since the fall of the Soviet Union, in December, 1991."

If this is the logic of the Russian invasion, the military incursion is unlikely to stop in Crimea: nearly all of eastern Ukraine is Russian-speaking. Russia defines its interests far beyond its Black Sea fleet and the Crimean peninsula […]

It's also worth noting that, in 1968, Moscow was reacting to the "threat" of the Prague Spring and to ideological liberalization in Eastern Europe; in 1979, the Kremlin leadership was reacting to the upheavals in Kabul. The rationale now is far flimsier, even in Moscow's own terms. The people of the Crimean peninsula were hardly under threat by "fascist gangs" from Kiev. In the east, cities like Donetsk and Kharkov had also been quiet, though that may already be changing. That's the advantage of Putin's state-controlled television and his pocket legislature; you can create any reality and pass any edict. [The New Yorker]

So far, the U.S. and other Western powers have condemned the Russian incursion without calling for forceful consequences beyond sanctions. That could change if Russia indeed decides to solidify its grasp on Crimea, or push on into Ukraine.

- - Jon Terbush

end quote from:

Why Russia might not stop with Crimea

It's anyone's guess how Russia will act in Ukraine over the coming days and weeks. The New Yorker's David Reminick, who spent years reporting out of Russia, and who recently wrote a fascinating analysis of Putin's worldview, argues that the situation could get much worse before it gets better. To…

The Week (RSS) 

 

Yes. If Putin sees himself as the guardian of the Russian (Soviet) Empire then Empires do not recognize any borders. All countries become vulnerable to a protector of the (Soviet Empire) especially all countries that were once behind the Iron Curtain until around 1990.

 

And he is already perfecting the way to do that.  Putin: "What? There are no Russian Soldiers in Crimea. There are only local militias."

 

If he can make the locals in all these countries believe this. (or even if he can't) how could any nation prove otherwise in the end? Asymmetrical Warfare practiced on an almost spy level in action.

 

If nations don't use uniforms with insignias how do you tell them apart with any certainty?