Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump Roll On, at Different Speeds

Photo
Donald J. Trump at his news conference in Palm Beach on Tuesday night. The candidate is winning, but at a terrible price. Credit Eric Thayer for The New York Times
Tuesday’s elections, with more than 14 million votes cast in five states, marked the more-than-halfway point in both parties’ presidential primary campaigns.
Democrats and Republicans can now confidently predict which candidates will have the most delegates at their conventions in July: Donald J. Trump and Hillary Clinton each hold large and growing delegate leads. It would take an upset of staggering proportions for a rival to pull ahead of either one by the time the primaries end in June.
But the two front-runners are not on equal footing. Mrs. Clinton has assembled a formidable majority coalition within the Democratic Party that has resisted Senator Bernie Sanders’s appeals.
Mr. Trump has achieved something less than that. He has locked down a large plurality of voters on the right, but not enough to guarantee that he will win a majority of Republican convention delegates. And his position appears to be weakening.
These are some of our most important takeaways from Tuesday’s voting:

Trump is bleeding

When presidential candidates get closer to their party’s nomination, they often gain stature and appear more formidable as they approach the general election. For Mr. Trump, the opposite may be happening.
He is winning, but at a terrible price. The intensifying attacks on his personal character and business record, and the scenes of violence at his rallies, appear to be taking a toll, exit polls show. In no state did a majority of Republican primary voters say they believed he was honest and trustworthy. In every state that voted on Tuesday except for Florida, about two in five Republicans said they would consider voting for a third-party candidate over Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton in November.

Clinton is in command

With landslide wins in Florida and Ohio, Mrs. Clinton re-established herself as the prohibitive favorite in the Democratic race. Taking Ohio by double digits, she eased fears that Mr. Sanders might become a breakaway favorite across the Midwest after his upset victory in Michigan last week.
There were no cracks in her base of support with black and Latino voters, or with older Democrats in general.
And voters appear sympathetic to her criticism of Mr. Sanders as a candidate making fantastical promises: In every state on Tuesday, about three-quarters of Democratic primary voters said they considered Mrs. Clinton’s policy proposals realistic, putting her ahead of Mr. Sanders in that category by double digits in every state but Illinois.

Kasich isn’t the Midwestern favorite

Photo
Gov. John Kasich celebrated his first win of the primary season in his home state, Ohio. Credit Mark Makela for The New York Times
Gov. John Kasich of Ohio did something unprecedented for him on Tuesday night: He won a state. To be sure, it was the state that elected him to nine terms in Congress and two as governor — but still, it was a breakthrough of a kind.
Winning Ohio, however, is valuable only if it helps spur a larger shift toward Mr. Kasich across the industrial Midwest. So far, he has little to show for all the attention he has lavished on the region. He finished third in Michigan last week and a distant third in Missouri on Tuesday. His best performance outside Ohio was pulling a fifth of the vote in Illinois — and again finishing third.
That’s not a regional campaign. It is a one-state candidacy. The pressure is on Mr. Kasich to show he can do better.

Sanders has a ceiling

Mr. Sanders has a strong and durable political coalition, just not one that ultimately adds up to victory in a Democratic primary. Young people continue to support him — he won among voters under 45 in every state but Florida on Tuesday — as do white voters in most states. But Mr. Sanders would have needed to make deep inroads with nonwhites by now to have a strong shot at the nomination, and he has not.
The calendar, however, is his friend: While the odds are powerfully against him, the next few rounds of voting will take place in states like Utah and Wisconsin, which resemble contests Mr. Sanders has won in the past.

Republicans are divided by class

The most important dividing lines in the Republican coalition are income and education levels. Mr. Trump has consistently scored better with less-educated voters, and the elections on Tuesday were no exception: Even as he lost Ohio by 11 points, Mr. Trump won pluralities there of white voters who lack college degrees, and of Ohioans who earn less than $50,000 per year.
In three states with close races — Illinois, Missouri and North Carolina — Mr. Trump won nearly half of voters without college degrees. But the best he managed with college graduates was a tie with Senator Ted Cruz in Illinois.
If Mr. Trump became the nominee, Republicans might risk a large-scale defection by upscale whites who voted willingly for Mitt Romney four years ago.

No comments: