Apple Shareholder Vote Blocked at Greenlight's Request
Bloomberg-20 minutes agoGreenlight Capital Inc. won an order blocking Apple Inc. (AAPL) from moving forward with a shareholder vote on provisions that include a ...
Apple Shareholder Vote Blocked at Greenlight’s Request
By Christie Smythe & Patricia Hurtado - Feb 22, 2013 12:55 PM PTDavid Einhorn's Greenlight Capital Inc. won an order blocking Apple Inc. from moving forward with a shareholder vote on provisions that include a measure limiting the company’s ability to issue preferred stock.
U.S. District Judge Richard Sullivan in Manhattan today granted Greenlight’s request for an injunction blocking the vote on the grounds that Apple had unfairly bundled three proposals, including the preferred shareholder measure it opposes with others it supports, under an item named “Proposal No. 2.”
Greenlight showed it would be irreparably harmed by the vote and that it will likely prevail in its suit alleging that the bundling of the items is illegal, Sullivan said in his ruling.
If the disputed measure passes, Greenlight “will be hampered with an amendment to the articles they oppose and which Apple presented illegally,” Sullivan wrote.
Greenlight, which says it holds more than 1.3 million Apple shares, sued alleging that the company’s grouping of the provisions violates U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules. The New York-based hedge fund firm and Einhorn, its founder, have urged Apple to issue high-yielding preferred stock in order to help shift the value of a $137 billion stockpile of cash to investors.
The measure up for vote at a Feb. 27 meeting would “eliminate” the Apple board’s power to issue preferred stock, Greenlight alleged in its complaint. Apple disputed that contention and said the move would only prevent the company from offering the stock without consent of other investors.
Apple, based in Cupertino, California, has also said it doesn’t believe it is breaking the law by grouping the matters up for vote.
Apple spokesman Steve Dowling didn’t immediately return a call seeking comment. Jonathan Doorley, a spokesman for Greenlight, said he didn’t have an immediate comment.
The case is Greenlight Capital LP v. Apple Inc. (AAPL), 13-cv- 00900, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).
To contact the reporter on this story: Christie Smythe in Brooklyn at csmythe1@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net.
end quote from:
Apple Shareholder Vote Blocked at Greenlight's Request
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Dow futures jump 600 points after Trump says he doesn’t plan to get rid of Fed chief: Live updates
- How does one learn to be in the right place at the right time all or most of the time?
- How does the Human Race not go extinct this century?
- We’re suddenly talking about the Great Depression when discussing Trump’s stock market
- What are the 4 types of Anthropology? begin quote from Google AI:
- March 12th 2025 in and on Mt. Shasta
- ‘He broke barriers’: One of the last survivors of elite group of paratroopers died. He was 108
- When I studied Cultural Anthropology at UCSC I was most interested in understanding cultures especially Tibetan Culture.
- Mt. Shasta tourism was the highest ever for winter skiing and such BEFORE Trump was inaugurated
- The Fed Chief Powell HAS to be non-political or the whole economic System will collapse in the U.S. and possibly the world too
Friday, February 22, 2013
Apple Shareholder vote blocked
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment