To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Trump to make announcement with Hegseth on shipbuilding from Mar-a-Lago
- Here's how much ACA premiums would have risen this year without tax subsidies:
- quote from Wikipedia: Mark Carney
- How the global food system is impacting obesity and climate change: Study
- As storms inundated Washington state, federal grants for flood mitigation work sat on hold
- Deputy AG says removing photos from Epstein files has 'nothing to do' with Trump(Sure thing) (ha ha)
- English actors Tom Hiddleston and Zawe Ashton welcome their second child
- gold has surged 70% since the Start of the Year
- reprint of: My Path to Enlightenment from 2011
- What is the main weakness of a Subaru 2017 PZEV engine: The Oil Seals and Gaskets. Why? (Part 2)
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
The Sequester: Better than Nothing?
This appears to be basically the point of view reached by both parties. It goes something like this: "We hate the sequester but if we do anything else our electorate is going to ride us out of town on a rail while tar and feathering us." Since so few people really understand the sequester, Congress might even get away with not changing it at all. (At least for a few weeks). Because if the screams become loud enough they can always change some things that are publicly unpopular. That doesn't mean it is fair or useful and not stupid. It just means "The squeaky wheel gets the oil". So, the more noise a group makes maybe it's rights will be recognized and actually dealt with. For everyone else it could be very difficult.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment