Sunday, April 3, 2016

The utilitarian view of the Trolley problem: which is the view that the average person would likely take

The Trolley problem is an ethical exercise to decide whether 5 people die or 1 person dies in a given situation. This is the problem people killing people with Hellfire missiles from military drones are facing every day around the world 24 hours a day every single day of the year for about 15 years now.

A utilitarian view asserts that it is obligatory to steer to the track with one man on it. According to simple utilitarianism, such a decision would be not only permissible, but, morally speaking, the better option (the other option being no action at all).[9] An alternate viewpoint is that since moral wrongs are already in place in the situation, moving to another track constitutes a participation in the moral wrong, making one partially responsible for the death when otherwise no one would be responsible. An opponent of action may also point to the incommensurability of human lives. Under some interpretations of moral obligation, simply being present in this situation and being able to influence its outcome constitutes an obligation to participate. If this is the case, then deciding to do nothing would be considered an immoral act if one values five lives more than one.

end partial quote from:

the Trolley Problem

No comments: