- Apr 19, 2016 · Eight former leaders of the U.S. Treasury have issued a warning to Britain: Don't even think about leaving the European Union. A decision to quit the EU ...
- IF the people of Britain vote for Brexit, it will not only be a historic victory for Eurosceptics but it will transform this nation forever. But what would happen?
- Feb 26, 2016 · Britain and the European Union The real danger of Brexit Leaving the EU would hurt Britain—and would also deal a terrible blow to the West Feb 27th 2016
Eight former leaders of the U.S. Treasury have issued a warning to Britain: Don't even think about leaving the European Union.A decision to quit the EU -- the Brexit scenario -- would result in an "extended period of uncertainty" for Britain that undermines its stability and economic prospects, they wrote in an open letter to The Times.
"A strong Britain, inside the European Union, remains the best hope in our view for securing Britain's future, creating a more prosperous Europe and protecting a healthy and resilient global economy," wrote the former U.S. officials.
Related: Brexit: A short guide to the next two months
George Schultz, Larry Summers, W. Michael Blumenthal, Robert Rubin, Paul O'Neill, John Snow, Hank Paulson and Timothy Geithner signed the letter. The group includes every former treasury chief since 1995, plus representatives from the Nixon and Carter administrations.
The intervention comes ahead of a visit by President Obama to the U.K. this week in which he is also expected to argue against Brexit.
Geithner, Paulson and co. underlined the risk to London's role as a global financial center: "EU membership allows banks based in London to sell their services across Europe without needing multiple regulatory approvals in each country. While Britain will remain an attractive center for finance even if Britain exits, it should not take for granted its global primacy when it is no longer the gateway to Europe."
Related: The good, the bad and the ugly Brexit scenarios
Campaigners for Brexit say Britain would be better off leaving the EU because it would no longer have to pay money into the bloc's budget, could abandon costly European regulations, limit immigration and negotiate its own free trade deals.
But the former U.S. officials cast doubt on those claims, warning that an exit would "likely disrupt and reduce trade flows" and curtail "the scale and efficiency benefits from economic cooperation and integration."
"Over time, Britain would no doubt be able to reestablish ties through new trade agreements," they said. "But as our own experience in the United States with trade negotiations shows, it is a difficult environment to negotiate and approve agreements and the risk of accidents is real."
Most independent forecasters and the International Monetary Fund argue that the U.K. will be worse off if voters choose to exit the EU.
Top 10 Posts This Month
- The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article
- reprint of: Drones very small to large
- Since the U.S. EPA is no longer functional here are the states with their own EPAs that will have to protect those states now
- Sand Fire information from CALFIRE
- GPS Satellites were invented when magnetic North and South moved to fast for useful navigation
- More U.S. soldiers in World War I died from the worldwide flu pandemic than from the war
- Reprint from 2010: To develop your gifts
- US Credit Cards With Smart Chip Technology
- European colonization of the Americas killed 10 percent of world population and caused global cooling
- Some allegations have been corroborated, while others remain unverified regarding the Steele File