At first glance I am abhorrent of the one child policy because of the harm it does to young men and women there who cannot find anyone to marry and the psychological damage it does to society there as well.
However, the alternative would be worse than ISIS in the Middle East in China if they had not had the wisdom to embark down this difficult path. The relative success in China, (despite the present recession) is owed almost exclusively to the one child policy.
For example, if a one child policy had been implemented in the Middle East around 1970 ISIS would not exist and most terrorists would not exist because there would be enough food, jobs, and land for everyone there to exist (at least theoretically). You would not find 14 million people trying to find somewhere to live that have been displaced from Iraq, Syria, LIbya and Yemen right now.
So, this is what real overpopulation does it destroys everything.
So, understanding that ISIS is only a symptom of overpopulation and misdirected anger gives enlightenment to the masses.
So, eliminating ISIS does nothing in the long run to solve the basic problem.
IF you now eliminate ISIS to you solve the refugee problem?
I think not.
IF you eliminate ISIS do you eliminate the overpopulation problem in the Middle East?
I think not.
Therefore eliminating ISIS only gets rid of a symptom of the problem and not the cause of the problem.
So, even if ISIS completely went away other terrorist groups are likely to form in the middle east because of not jobs, not enough water, not enough food can be grown there so there won't be enough jobs for people to resort to crime to survive. And one of the forms of crime is terrorism which is always associated with drug dealing, human trafficking and all the very worst in humanity.
However, only by understanding that the root cause of all this is overpopulation will there EVER be a solution to this.
So, logically looking at this the situation in the Middle East can only get worse until birth control is taken as seriously there as the Chinese have taken it in their one child policy.
Otherwise by 2100 the Middle East likely will be only a wasteland of continued ongoing battles including nukes.
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Cancer rates 1900 to 2000 and beyond
- Dolly Parton on English version of Wikipedia
- Ballard's work with the I AM Movement is considered a predecessor to the current new age movement.
- Finalists Win Big Laughs in The Comedy Wildlife Photography Awards – LOOK
- Hurricane Simon pounds resorts and vulnerable towns along Mexico's Pacific coast
- Israelis mourn on the anniversary of the Oct. 7 as Palestinians grapple with war it sparked
- Wikipedia under the heading: Magical thinking
- Writing to save the world
- 8 killed, including 2 children, in Pennsylvania mass shooting; suspect also dead
- Why I'm somewhat reassured by the following lInk (at least regarding the winds in California)(regarding projections for 2100AD)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment