The most extreme response to world human overpopulation is Terrorism.
Basically, in terrorism one is saying: "I'm going to lie to myself so I can kill almost everyone and feel okay or good about it."
Then you have the diametrically opposite response:
Political Correctness:
Which is saying: "I'm going to lie both to you and to myself so I don't have to kill you."
Which is a better response to human overpopulation worldwide?
I think in some ways when you have human overpopulation you are going to have aberrant responses like this.
In the first response human civilization is going to end and humans will revert to being animals once again.
But, in the second response another type of aberrant insanity ensues and eventually civilization becomes dysfunctional and ends.
Neither response saves humanity from extinction through thinking either way eventually.
So, what is the response that might prevent human extinction because it is neither one of these responses?
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- A Tragic Loss | Tesla Motors
- These Are The Possible Future Leaders Of Britain
- HTTPS?
- House passes marijuana decriminalization
- This is what the code looks like displayed on a page
- For example, an IPhone is probably the most vulnerable security device you can get. Why would I choose to have one?
- Volkswagen Beetle by Wikipedia
- Cancer rates 1900 to 2000 and beyond
- Ancien régime: (or the monarchy before Louis XVI was guillotined along with Marie Antoinette)
- Ford Model T (produced from 1908 until 1927)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment