The most extreme response to world human overpopulation is Terrorism.
Basically, in terrorism one is saying: "I'm going to lie to myself so I can kill almost everyone and feel okay or good about it."
Then you have the diametrically opposite response:
Political Correctness:
Which is saying: "I'm going to lie both to you and to myself so I don't have to kill you."
Which is a better response to human overpopulation worldwide?
I think in some ways when you have human overpopulation you are going to have aberrant responses like this.
In the first response human civilization is going to end and humans will revert to being animals once again.
But, in the second response another type of aberrant insanity ensues and eventually civilization becomes dysfunctional and ends.
Neither response saves humanity from extinction through thinking either way eventually.
So, what is the response that might prevent human extinction because it is neither one of these responses?
To the best of my ability I write about my experience of the Universe Past, Present and Future
Top 10 Posts This Month
- Because of fighting in Ukraine and Israel Bombing Iran I thought I should share this EMP I wrote in 2011
- The 70s: Wikipedia
- The 60s: Wikipedia
- reprint of: Drones very small to large
- most read articles from KYIV Post
- Keri Russell pulls back the curtain on "The Diplomat" (season 2 filming now for Netflix)
- The ultra-lethal drones of the future | New York Post 2014 article
- "There is nothing so good that no bad may come of it and nothing so bad that no good may come of it": Descartes
- Jack Ryan from Prime (4 seasons)
- When I began to write "A Journey through Time"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment